메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
중앙법학회 중앙법학 중앙법학 제16집 제4호
발행연도
2014.12
수록면
159 - 183 (25page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The Content Dispute Resolution Committee(we call it as “CDRC”) of the Republic of Korea has provided so special and fast dispute resolution supporting service in the contents industry domain so that has a big role to make healthy and fair contents market environment. CDRC started 3 years ago and has received about 12,000 cases and it has made parties to get about 6,000 agreements. And the CDRC performed 205 successful resolution cases through 200 mediation meetings. But the system`s problems were exposed through 3 years operation time and these problems should be improved by the amendment of Contents Industry Promotion Act. CDRC should enlarge the notion of content disputes and make legal basis of various ADR methods likewise conciliation, mediation and arbitration. The principal of Party Autonomy must be observed in mediation process. If one party do not want to keep mediation process, the process will be finished. CDRC should not force parties to join in mediation against their`s will. And CDRC needs the new additional provisions on the suspension of prescription. Nowadays CDRC`s mediation proposal which agreed by parties has same effect like a fix decision by court. But it`s not desirable because it deprives parties of the right of access to courts. And it make people who participate in mediation process very serious so they will be reluctant to join mediation process and it draws leading handicap to hold mediation. I look forward to approve CDRC`s mediation & operation system by amendment of the Contents Industry Promotion Act.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (16)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-360-002574481