메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
중앙법학회 중앙법학 중앙법학 제12집 제1호
발행연도
2010.3
수록면
7 - 44 (38page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The accomplishments of the Korean Constitutional Court(KCC) over the past twenty one years have been nothing short of astounding. Especially, the KCC`s power of controlling administrative actions becomes wider and stronger. The article examines the constitutional-judicial control over administrative actions in East Asian countries such as China, Taiwan, and Japan. Here, related provisions and judicial rulings in each country are heavily studied. In China, while the Soviet system of legislative control does not work efficiently, the administrative tribunal of the People`s Court, in the recent wave of “judicializing constitution law”, begins to play a significant role of scrutinizing administrative actions. In Taiwan, though the Grand Justices of the Judicial Yuan extend their jurisdiction and review the precedents of the Administrative Court, they cannot exercise direct control over the courts, for there is a sharp distinction between constitutional interpretation and judicial ruling. After World Was II, Japan adopted the American model of judicial review, however, the overwhelming tendency of judicial passivism prevents the courts from reviewing administrative actions. The KCC`s controlling power over administrative lawsuits goes far over the Supreme People`s Court of China and the Supreme Court of Japan, even over the Judicial Yuan of Taiwan, and its overwhelming tendency of judicial activism in controlling administrative actions should be reconsidered.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-360-002581044