메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
중앙법학회 중앙법학 중앙법학 제9집 제3호
발행연도
2007.10
수록면
353 - 381 (29page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This article focused on "contract" that causes the credits` the debts in discussing the theory of responsibility of a contract, examined and compared traditional theories with the contents of a contract, and discussed how the contents of a contract affects the theories of law that deal with the problems when there was a default. The theory called the new theory of responsibility of a contract analyzes the theory of responsibility of a contract, focusing on contract. Base don the theory, this artic le will study ````a claim of fulfil1men t", "default", "the effect of compensation for damage", "disso1ution" in order. To sum up, the contents run as follows. First, a claim of fulfillment in the traditiona1 theories was directly based on the credits but it in the new theory of responsibility of a contract is the means the parties can take adequate interests or value by contract. In other words, a claim of fulfillment is considered as one of remedy. Second, a reason for fault by the default in traditiona1 theories was considered the same as bad faith and negligence of a debtor or the theory of faithfulness, but "a reason for fault" in the new theory of responsibility of a contract was defined itse1f as failure of performance under contract. Then, the issues of a reason for fault have been re1eased from the dogmas of the liability for negligence Such release from the dogmas of the liability for negligence can be seen in the compensation for damage. In other words, while a party occurring injuries and damages to other parties has a liability for the injury and the damage s in traditional theories, in the new theory, a party neglecting the performance of a contract also has a liability base don the binding power of a contract so the principle of the liability for negligence does not separate from it. Third, in connection with dissolution, traditiona1 theory understood the disso1ution system as a liability for default and the dissolution play. the function of discipline to give disadvantage to the non-performing party so it also needs "a reason for fault" as well as the compensation for damage. The new theory of responsibility of a contract, however, understood the disso1ution system to free from the binding of contract so it should separate from the compensation for damage. Like this, the new theory of responsibility of a contract has not accepted sufficiently its completion because it tries to solve problems based on specific terms in contract or parties` choices by grounding "pacta sunt servanda "(a contract must be kept) or the binding power of a contract. However, the traditional theory in the type of consequence obligation admitting a reason for fault by de fault can explain reasonab1y that if the re is non-performance, there is a reason for fault without a reason for excuse. That in type of means obligation also can explain the decision of non-performance and reason for fault and opens the new possibility of reorganization for the construction of the responsibility in contract. In practice, this theory can he1p to find substantial truth and lead to examine care fully parties` intention without going through the theory of the default.
#계약 #계약은 지켜야 한다 #계약의 구속력 #계약책임론 #과실책임이론 #귀책사유 #a reason for fault by the default #contract #pacta sunt servanda #the binding power of a contract #the theory of Liability for negligence #the theory of responsibility of a contract

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청
참고문헌이 DBpia에서 서비스 중이라면, [참고문헌 신청]을 통해 등록해보세요

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

일본 채권법개정의 기본방침상 계약책임과 채무불이행의 효과로서 손해배상과 해제
오호철 법학연구 2011 .11

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-360-002571622