메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이평전 (서원대)
저널정보
문학과환경학회 문학과환경 문학과환경 제14권 3호
발행연도
2015.12
수록면
115 - 136 (22page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In this writing, while limits of advanced researches are examined, eco-ethical aspects which are shown in novels in the 1970s are explained based on the theory of Hans Jonas. To assert responsibility for life, he keenly looked into bioethical weak points of traditional ethics. To propose the measures, he searches for grounds of eco-ethical ontology of “responsibility for the present and future of life”. In works of main authors in the 1970s such as Yoon Heung-gil, Jo Se-hee, Han Seung-won, and Kim Won-il, eco-ethical responses can be found out. In these works, diverse variations of ethical introspection centered on relationship between humans and nature generally appear. First, Yoon Heung-gil repeats ethical introspection in order to solve the reality of Korean division as the best solution task of Korean people which is still effective, a lot of contradictions derived from the division, overall problems caused from the course of industrialization in the 1970s, and problems of power existing in our daily life. Kim Won-il concretely agonizes over things like “problems of reality are just problems of me and all of us,” and “how should I live?” while he expresses the past of his childhood and the future society simultaneously without burying his head in the sand or being indulged in the transcendental world. So, in these points, eco-ethical aspects can be seen. Along with them, A Small Ball Shot up by a Dwarf of Jo Se-hee sends a warning message against ills of industrial cities and damage to life values and is varied through diverse styles and metaphors. It is noticeable in that these works show ethical recognition not only targeting just humans or relations between humans but also the whole dimension of existence including ecosystems. The fact that the eco-ethical viewpoint of Jonas is important is that meanings of life phenomena are deeply understood through metaphysical philosophical exploration without simply stopping in biological exploration into the life phenomena. It provides philosophical routes which are important in discussing problems of literature, environment, and ecosystem sin the 1970s when ill sand discrepancies which were taken by excessive growth ideology came to the foreasrealcrisisafterdrastically processed industrialization and urbanization planning passed.

목차

1. 1970년대 문학과 생태윤리
2. 인간중심주의와 사유의 전회
3. 공포의 발견과 책임윤리
4. 생의 의지와 자유로서의 윤리
5. 결론을 대신하여
인용문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-810-002337689