지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this research, I studied on the kana notations of rhyme Ma(麻) in six Sino-Japanese dictionaries. The results of this research as followings.
1) Sino-Japanese Kan’on is appears as a -a type in all of six Sino-Japanese dictionaries. but Go’on is appears as a -e type almost and as a -ja type, -a type. And kana notation of Go’on is different in six Sino-Japanese dictionaries.
2) Ka(カ) is a kana notation of Jia(加) in the Kikiman’yo and it is appears as a Ka(カ) also in Go’on because of Go’on effected by kana notation of Kikiman’yo. The kana notation of Kikiman’yo must be contained in Go’on because of kana notation of Kikiman’yo is not classified as a Sino-Japanese in Sino-Japanese dictionaries.
3) A(ア), Kana notation of A(亞) is classified as a Go’on in all of six Sino-Japanese dictionaries. but Go’on is a E(エ) because it is appears as a E(エ) in Kojiki.
4) Labials of Sino-Japanese Go’on in rhyme Ma(麻) are not consistent in six Sino-Japanese dictionaries. The kana notations of Go’on in Labial is Ha(把), Ha(覇), Me(馬), Ma(麻).
5) There are mistakes in all of six dictionaries to the notations of Cha(茶). The right kana notations are as that Go’on is Da(ダ), Kan’on is Cha(チャ), To’on is Sa(サ).
6) Dentals in Go’on of rhyme Ma(麻) are appears as a -ja type.
7) Kan’on is appears as a -wa type in all of six Sino-Japanese dictionaries. but Go’on is appears as a -we type almost and as -wa type in the case of rhymes that contained ‘w’ also.
8) Go’on of the Gwa(寡) is Kwa(クワ)>Ka(カ) because it is appears as a Kwa(クワ) and it is not appears as a Kwe(クヱ) in Go’on data.
9) Go’on of the wa(瓦) is Gwa(グワ)>Ga(ガ) because it is appears as a Gwa(グワ) and it is not appears as a Gwe(グヱ) in Go’on data.
10) Go’on of the Hua(華) is not consistent in six Sino-Japanese dictionaries. but Go’on of that is Kwe(クヱ)>Ke(ケ) because initial of that is ‘h’.
1) Sino-Japanese Kan’on is appears as a -a type in all of six Sino-Japanese dictionaries. but Go’on is appears as a -e type almost and as a -ja type, -a type. And kana notation of Go’on is different in six Sino-Japanese dictionaries.
2) Ka(カ) is a kana notation of Jia(加) in the Kikiman’yo and it is appears as a Ka(カ) also in Go’on because of Go’on effected by kana notation of Kikiman’yo. The kana notation of Kikiman’yo must be contained in Go’on because of kana notation of Kikiman’yo is not classified as a Sino-Japanese in Sino-Japanese dictionaries.
3) A(ア), Kana notation of A(亞) is classified as a Go’on in all of six Sino-Japanese dictionaries. but Go’on is a E(エ) because it is appears as a E(エ) in Kojiki.
4) Labials of Sino-Japanese Go’on in rhyme Ma(麻) are not consistent in six Sino-Japanese dictionaries. The kana notations of Go’on in Labial is Ha(把), Ha(覇), Me(馬), Ma(麻).
5) There are mistakes in all of six dictionaries to the notations of Cha(茶). The right kana notations are as that Go’on is Da(ダ), Kan’on is Cha(チャ), To’on is Sa(サ).
6) Dentals in Go’on of rhyme Ma(麻) are appears as a -ja type.
7) Kan’on is appears as a -wa type in all of six Sino-Japanese dictionaries. but Go’on is appears as a -we type almost and as -wa type in the case of rhymes that contained ‘w’ also.
8) Go’on of the Gwa(寡) is Kwa(クワ)>Ka(カ) because it is appears as a Kwa(クワ) and it is not appears as a Kwe(クヱ) in Go’on data.
9) Go’on of the wa(瓦) is Gwa(グワ)>Ga(ガ) because it is appears as a Gwa(グワ) and it is not appears as a Gwe(グヱ) in Go’on data.
10) Go’on of the Hua(華) is not consistent in six Sino-Japanese dictionaries. but Go’on of that is Kwe(クヱ)>Ke(ケ) because initial of that is ‘h’.
목차
序論
本論
結論
參考文獻
Abstract
참고문헌 (50)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
漢和辭典 效攝韻 字音 規定의 문제점
일어일문학연구
2016 .02
-
韓國漢字音에 나타나는 i母音添加現象에 대하여 : 日本漢字音 · 越南漢字音과의 비교를 중심으로
일본문화학보
2015 .11
-
国字本『こんてむつすむん地』の表記
일본어문학
2024 .02
-
韓 · 日 · 越漢字音での開口2等韻における受容様相の比較考察
일본어학연구
2018 .12
-
19세기 말~20세기 초 일본 간행 한국어 학습서를 통해 본 한국어 발음 교육 - 한글 표기에 대응하는 가나 표기를 중심으로 -
돈암어문학
2020 .12
-
한중일한자음과의 비교를 통한 베트남한자음의 자음체계 연구
국제언어문학
2022 .08
-
日本漢字音 蟹攝 1·2等韻의 -a형에 대하여
일어일문학연구
2015 .05
-
對應規則을 통한 日本漢字音 指導法 : ㅇ계열을 중심으로
일본연구
2018 .02
-
베트남漢字音과의 비교를 통한 韓日漢字音의 字音體系 비교연구 - 聲類를 중심으로 -
일본어학연구
2020 .03
-
대응규칙을 통한 일본한자음 학습법 - aŋ · ak계열을 중심으로
아시아문화연구
2019 .08
-
대응규칙을 통한 일본한자음 학습법 -an·al계열을 중심으로-
일본연구
2019 .08
-
漢和辭典 侯韻 字音 規定의 문제점
일본학보
2016 .01
-
개화기에 편찬된 이중어 사전 속의 한자음 실태
국어사연구
2017 .01
-
한자사전 字音 處理의 原則과 實際에 대한 比較
동양학
2015 .01
-
日本漢字音字音形の創出要因に関する研究 -他国の漢字音との比較を通して(喉音系)-
일어일문학
2023 .08
-
韓日漢字音과의 비교를 통한 베트남漢字音 3等 甲乙類 구별에 대하여 : 中古漢語 陽聲韻을 중심으로
한국민족문화
2015 .08
-
위기에서의 선택 — 한국전쟁에 대한 중국의 정책 결정 논평 —
중국근현대사연구
2022 .03
-
현대 자전류의 한자음 덧생김 요인 분석
우리말연구
2023 .04
-
唐宋音における假攝韻の字音形について
일본문화연구
2019 .07
-
紫霞 申緯의 「東人論詩絶句三十五首」 다시 읽기
한국한문학연구
2021 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-830-002000627