지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The achievements of ROK"s Peace-keeping activities have been evaluated just by humanitarian performance or its contribution to promoting South Korea"s international status. The goal of this study is to replace this perspective with new approach for two reasons. Firstly, PKO is supposed to help establish sustainable peace in the countries in the middle of civil war. Secondly, it is widely accepted that good governance is a requirement for sustainable peace. Therefore, this study examines the extent to which ROK"s PKO improved governance in six countries to which South Korea sent troop to participate in UN PKOs (East Timor, Afghanistan, Haiti, Iraq, Somalia, and Lebanon). The analysis on Worldwide Governance Indicator demonstrates that governance was improved in East Timor(rules of law), Afghanistan(rules of law), and Haiti(political stability), even though a specific area of governance that experienced improvement varied across countries. In Iraq and Lebanon(political stability) and in Somalia(social accountability), however, governance was deteriorated in spite of international intervention. In order to explain this variation, this study used Mason and Fett"s expected utility model to suggest two hypotheses. Major findings go as follows. Firstly, governance was improved where international society successively decreased possibility that civil war parties win military victory and increased utility that is expected to get from international society by ending the use of violence. Secondly, military engagement by international forces was helpless unless it can prevent civil war party from using violence to win military victory. Thirdly, South Korean PKOs have not necessarily been integrated into international effort to establish sustainable peace. However, this was not decisive factor to improve governance in civil war countries. On the basis of these results, we suggest policy alternatives regarding an improvement direction for ROK"s PKO on the basis of these findings.
목차
1. 문제제기
2. 기존 연구 검토
3. 거버넌스 향상 지역의 한국군 활동: 동티모르, 아프가니스탄, 아이티
4. 거버넌스 하락 지역의 한국군 활동: 이라크, 소말리아, 레바논
5. 결론 및 정책적 함의
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (36)
참고문헌 신청
Constance V. / 2006 / in Conflict Prevention and Peace building in Post-War Societies: Sustaining Peace / Routledge :240
James D. Meernik / 2006 / in Conflict Prevention and Peace building in Post-War Societies: Sustaining Peace / Routledge :160~175
Sam Egere / 2000 / Promoting Good Governance: Principles, Practices and Perspectives / Publications unit Common wealth Secretariat :23
Oxfam International / Whose Aid is it Anyway? Politicizing Aid in Conflicts and Crises
세계은행 홈페이지
James D. Meernik / 2006 / in Conflict Prevention and Peace building in Post-War Societies: Sustaining Peace / Routledge :160~175
Sam Egere / 2000 / Promoting Good Governance: Principles, Practices and Perspectives / Publications unit Common wealth Secretariat :23
Oxfam International / Whose Aid is it Anyway? Politicizing Aid in Conflicts and Crises
세계은행 홈페이지
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-390-001813290