지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Computer network attack or Cyber attack brings legal issues whether it can be interpreted as a armed attack within the meaning of Article 51 of the Charter. However, there is no definite authoritative interpretation on the issue. Fitting cyber attack within the traditional framework for armed conflict is very difficult, because its unique and ambiguous characteristics. For example, cyber attack can cause any destruction at the speed of light, the damage takes place as soon as the attack has been launched. And then, what international law principles offer the best solutions for extending their application to cyber attacks?
Article 2(4) of the UN Charter declares that “all Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.” Determining whether a cyber attack violates this general prohibition on the use of force requires an understanding of 1) how force is interpreted in international law, and 2) whether cyber attacks can reach the appropriate level under those standards. When there is a conflict between nations, the Charter demands that members “settle their international disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security, and justice, are not endangered.” Thus, the authority for a state"s use of force originates either from the UN Security Council or by the state"s right to act in individual or collective self-defense.
The other issue is whether cyber attacks can be regarded as ‘armed attack’ that the right to self-defense under Article 51 of the Charter can be applied. Article 51 provides that “Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent fight of individual or collective self-defence if an armed attack occurs against a member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to maintain international peace and security.” What is difference between an ‘armed attack’ under Article 51 and a ‘use of force’ under article 2(4)? Cyber attacks are usually designed to damage a target state"s computer networks instantaneously. A state might find evidence of a cyber attacker"s attempted network infringement. In such case, the target state may invoke its right to respond in self-defense if the criteria provided in article 51 are met.
Article 2(4) of the UN Charter declares that “all Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.” Determining whether a cyber attack violates this general prohibition on the use of force requires an understanding of 1) how force is interpreted in international law, and 2) whether cyber attacks can reach the appropriate level under those standards. When there is a conflict between nations, the Charter demands that members “settle their international disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security, and justice, are not endangered.” Thus, the authority for a state"s use of force originates either from the UN Security Council or by the state"s right to act in individual or collective self-defense.
The other issue is whether cyber attacks can be regarded as ‘armed attack’ that the right to self-defense under Article 51 of the Charter can be applied. Article 51 provides that “Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent fight of individual or collective self-defence if an armed attack occurs against a member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to maintain international peace and security.” What is difference between an ‘armed attack’ under Article 51 and a ‘use of force’ under article 2(4)? Cyber attacks are usually designed to damage a target state"s computer networks instantaneously. A state might find evidence of a cyber attacker"s attempted network infringement. In such case, the target state may invoke its right to respond in self-defense if the criteria provided in article 51 are met.
목차
국문초록
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 컴퓨터네트워크 공격과 무력사용의 금지
Ⅲ. 컴퓨터네트워크 공격과 국제법상 자위권
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
The Countermeasure Strategy Based on Big Data against North Korean Cyber-attacks
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2018 .01
-
사이버 공격과 Jus in Bello
국제법학회논총
2015 .12
-
북한의 사이버공격과 대응방안에 관한 연구
한국IT서비스학회지
2016 .01
-
Development of Countermeasures against North Korean Cyberterrorism through Research Case Studies
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2015 .01
-
싸이킷런과 사이버위협 데이터셋을 이용한 사이버 공격 그룹의 분류
융합정보논문지
2018 .01
-
뉴 스페이스 시대의 우주무기화에 대한 국제법적 고찰: 국제인도법 원칙을 중심으로
한양법학
2022 .02
-
사이버공격 억지를 위한 적극적 방어개념의 국제법적 적법성
국제법학회논총
2018 .06
-
Russia’s Attack on Ukraine and International Law
IFANS FOCUS
2022 .03
-
Implications of the Nice Attack and Prospects: Expanded Soft-Target Terror Attacks and Disintegration of Everyday Life
IFANS FOCUS
2016 .07
-
금융안정을 위한 금융거래의 사이버보안에 관한 법제 분석
은행법연구
2017 .05
-
NS-3와 이산 사건 시뮬레이터를 이용한 유연한 DDoS 시뮬레이션에 관한 연구
한국경영과학회 학술대회논문집
2015 .04
-
UN헌장 제51조상의‘무력공격’에 이르지 않는 소규모 적대행위에 대한 무력대응 가능성과 그 국제법적 한계 -‘부대자위권’의 개념정립을 위한 시론 -
국제법학회논총
2019 .12
-
DDoS 공격에 대한 선제적 침입 탐지·차단 방안
한국IT서비스학회지
2016 .01
-
‘선제적 자위’의 역사적 이해와 북한 핵위협 대비 선제공격의 정당성에 대한 연구
군사
2015 .09
-
각국의 사이버테러 대응실태 분석을 통한 한국의 대응체계 구축방안
한국국가안보·국민안전학회지
2017 .06
-
Cyber Insurance and Distribution Channels
유통과학연구
2018 .01
-
해운 사이버 보안 공격 패턴 및 강화 방안 분석
해운물류연구
2024 .09
-
국제법상 무력사용 금지와 새로운 안보 위협 - 사이버전과 하이브리전을 중심으로 -
외법논집
2020 .01
-
사이버테러 대응을 위한 법체계 검토
법학연구
2015 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-362-001865803