지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술대회자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2015.8
- 수록면
- 81 - 93 (13page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Public Engagement Commission on Spent Nuclear Fuel Management decided to collect public opinion in order to increase social receptivity of Spent Nuclear Fuel Management Policy. Established in October 2013, the Commission, determined to lead the public opinion from an independent position from the government, and advise the government based on the public opinion. Meanwhile, separate from the Commission, the Special Committee of the Communities that has a nuclear power plant] promoted their project that collects the public opinion by appointing a special institution in each five region.
It is quite promising to accomplish its goal of collecting public opinion on Sepnt Nuclear Fuel management as one of the procedures of democracy, “public interest defense,” as shown at public survey result in Gijang-gun. However, if its ultimate goal is self-assessment of the risk, suggesting solutions, and participating in the decision making process, it seems difficult to achieve its goal because the field of nuclear fuel management requires expertise. The survey result shows that although the discussion succeeded in delivering information, it failed to form sympathy, due to the antipathy for collecting public opinion result from the late attempt, misunderstanding of the intension, lack of government’s strong willingness and so on.
At the survey and discussion during the procedure of collecting public opinion on spent nuclear fuel management, local residents asked for reliability in nuclear energy policy and responsible attitude of the government. Above all, the most residents claimed that the government and K-water has failed to carry out their promises while speaking out the damage caused by the nuclear faculty in their community over the past forty years. In addition, the residents insisted that the health and safety of the local residents are the top priorities. Lastly, they asked government to establish a plan for permanent disposal of spent nuclear fuel as soon as possible.
Both public and the principal agent of collecting public opinion have agreed on the fact that spent nuclear fuel management is a conundrum. It is essential to have such bond of sympathy and seek increasing reliability in government policy.
It is quite promising to accomplish its goal of collecting public opinion on Sepnt Nuclear Fuel management as one of the procedures of democracy, “public interest defense,” as shown at public survey result in Gijang-gun. However, if its ultimate goal is self-assessment of the risk, suggesting solutions, and participating in the decision making process, it seems difficult to achieve its goal because the field of nuclear fuel management requires expertise. The survey result shows that although the discussion succeeded in delivering information, it failed to form sympathy, due to the antipathy for collecting public opinion result from the late attempt, misunderstanding of the intension, lack of government’s strong willingness and so on.
At the survey and discussion during the procedure of collecting public opinion on spent nuclear fuel management, local residents asked for reliability in nuclear energy policy and responsible attitude of the government. Above all, the most residents claimed that the government and K-water has failed to carry out their promises while speaking out the damage caused by the nuclear faculty in their community over the past forty years. In addition, the residents insisted that the health and safety of the local residents are the top priorities. Lastly, they asked government to establish a plan for permanent disposal of spent nuclear fuel as soon as possible.
Both public and the principal agent of collecting public opinion have agreed on the fact that spent nuclear fuel management is a conundrum. It is essential to have such bond of sympathy and seek increasing reliability in government policy.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 공론화의 이론적 이해
Ⅲ. 공론화의 수행과정
Ⅳ. 공론화의 결과
Ⅴ. 공론화의 성과와 한계
Ⅵ. 결론
【참고문헌】
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
청대 장서가(藏書家)가 조선서적에 대한 수집 및 전파 : 청대 동문환이 수집한 조선시문을 중심으로
중앙대학교 문화콘텐츠기술연구원 학술대회
2016 .08
-
다문화 역사교육을 위한 교재개발과 내용구성 : 사례연구를 중심으로
중앙대학교 문화콘텐츠기술연구원 학술대회
2016 .08
-
「米韓原子力協定」の締結と韓米関係-1950年代の日米韓関係における原子力平和利用を中心に
전남대학교 글로벌디아스포라연구소 국제학술회의
2016 .05
-
万葉集と懐風藻との交流 : 柳を詠む詩歌を中心に
중앙대학교 문화콘텐츠기술연구원 학술대회
2016 .08
-
韩国与中国的区域经济增长收敛假说的比较 : 利用组合测试
중국과 중국학
2016 .01
-
日本老舗の社会的活動と地域経済に関する考察
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2017 .10
-
일본의 지역 교육력 향상을 위한 도도부현의 역할 및 시책
한국일본교육학연구
2016 .01
-
일본의 과소지역 재원확보책: 지방세징수를 중심으로
한국지방재정학회 세미나자료집
2019 .09
-
[지정토론문] 東아시아 國土計劃法制의 最近動向 및 主要爭點 : 특히 國土計劃法制의 懸案과 課題를 中心으로
저스티스
2017 .02
-
[지정토론문] 東아시아 國土計劃法制의 最近動向 및 主要爭點 : 특히 國土計劃法制의 懸案과 課題를 中心으로
저스티스
2017 .02
-
機械翻訳によって減少した日本語作文の誤用例 -韓国の大学生を中心にして-
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2023 .10
-
地域活性化活動に有効なメディア活用の考察(Ⅲ)‒市民が主体性を持てる地域づくり活動参加への仮説構築について‒
일본근대학연구
2022 .11
-
Occurrence and Development of Korean Farmers' Movement (1993-2008) and Its Implications to China - Focusing on Market Globalization and Government Trust Crisis -
농촌지도와 개발
2019 .01
-
住民と行政による?光資源を活用した地域人材育成 ?岡山?倉敷市岡田地?での金田一耕助イベントを事例に?
일본근대학연구
2021 .11
-
日本老舗の社会的活動と地域経済に関する考察
동북아 문화연구
2017 .12
-
일본 ODA의 국제규범 준수와 공여국 중심주의: 개발협력대강을 중심으로
한림일본학
2017 .01
-
植民地期釜山における衛生事業 ‒地域社会と共同墓地の導入をめぐって‒
일본근대학연구
2022 .08
-
중국 인공지능의 국가적 수용과 그 의미: 2015-2017 국가 공문 분석을 중심으로
중국학보
2018 .01
-
日中漢字音の対比研究 : 多音字を中心に
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2018 .10
-
地域開発政策と地方自治の関係 - 北海道における経験から
한국지방정부학회 학술대회자료집
2015 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
미국 행정법에서의 전자적 방식에 의한 규칙제정
박동열
미국헌법연구
2014
.08
촛불집회와 집합지성 - 토의민주주의적 해석
오현철
민주주의와 인권
2010
.04
신고리 공론화가 우리에게 남긴 것은
고인석
Electric Power
2017
.11
사용 후 핵연료 관리와 사회적 의사결정의 공론화
안삼영
,
장명학
한국환경교육학회 학술대회 자료집
2014
.12
신고리 5·6호기 공론화, 원전사업·지역경제 거시적 관점에서 모색해야 : 공정한 공론화 방향모색 국회 토론회 개최_원칙과 방향정립 위한 찬·반 양측 토론 진행
이재용
Electric Power
2017
.09
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-910-001857332