메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Choi, Seokhun (연세대학교)
저널정보
한국현대영미드라마학회 현대영미드라마 현대영미드라마 제28권 제1호
발행연도
2015.4
수록면
203 - 230 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
American stage has been dominated by male playwrights while not many women’s voices have been heard. The lack of a discernible tradition of female playwrights is at least partly responsible for the vicious cycle of gender inequality in contemporary American theatre. While not much research has been conducted on Sarah Ruhl’s works, her plays are usually discussed in relation to canonical male writers of modern western theatre or in the context of third wave feminism, often described as “whimsical.” Rather than indicating her debt to the male-centered theatrical heritage of modern western theatre or focusing on her uniqueness against other women writers of her previous generations, the essay aims to discover dramaturgical continuity between one of her major plays, The Clean House (2005), and a monumental play that represents the first and second waves of feminism, Susan Glaspell’s Trifles (1916).
Using the motifs of trifling, motive, and bonding, the two plays stress the importance of women’s household responsibilities and community. In both works, these three themes are closely related; belittling domestic labor and apathetic understanding of human psychology appear as barriers to achieving a true bond between the characters. Through these critiques of trifling and motive, Trifles and The Clean House ultimately show the importance of human bonding transcending secular concerns and social differences. Situating the two important modern dramas of different generations in dialogue, the study hopes to contribute to the development of a more discernible tradition of women playwrights.

목차

Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Trifling, Motive, and Bonding in Trifles
Ⅲ. Trifles in The Clean House
Ⅳ. Conclusion
Works Cited
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-842-001448581