지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Journal of Youngsan Theology is comprised of 151 articles that focus on a single individual’s religious ideologies. That individual is a pastor named Younggi Cho. The Journal has only one purpose to apologize for youngsan’s religious tenets. The interpreters of youngsan’s theology argue that youngsan theology is a God-centered theology, rather than human-centered. The interpreters of youngsan theology have endeavored to relate youngsan’s religious idea to reformation tradition and contemporary theology. To them, youngsan’s religious idea contains the elements that verify the sovereignty of God over the human need to search for him. As a result, they take youngsan’s religious ideas to prominent reformation figures such as Luther, Calvin, and most relevant contemporary thinkers such as Kierkegaard, Tillich, Pannenberg, and even Gardamer. In doing so, they persuade readers to accept youngsan’s theology as the relevant theology in relation to the reformation tradition and contemporary theology. I agree with them on the grounds that youngsan theology has elements that pertain to God-centered theology. Indeed, Youngsan theology has roots from the reformation tradition and is relevant to contemporary religious thinking. However, I disagree with their belief that the root of youngsan theology is mainstream reformation. Also, I do not see the relevance of youngsan theology for the contemporary theological situation lies in the mainline thinkers as they claim. I argue that the reformation roots of youngsan theology does not lie in the mainline reformers, but in Balthasar Hubmeier who initiated the anabaptist movement. It is my belief that the theology of Karl Heim is the source of the relevance of youngsan theology as the comtemporary circumstance. It is well known that Karl Heim applied the scientific understanding dimension concepts to the idea of God much like youngsan, which has unique concepts regarding the theological anthropology and the fourth dimension. I will verify the reformation roots of youngsan’s theology and contemporary thinking based on youngsan’s unique ideas, which is the main objective of this article.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (35)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 권혁승 / 2004 / 구약 샬롬축복론의 관점에서 본 영산의 삼중축복론 / 영산신학저널 1
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김문기 / 2009 / 영산의 목회에 나타난 프랑케의 할레 경건주의 목회유형 / 영산신학저널 16
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김판호 / 2007 / 영산의 신학적 인간이해: 전인구원 중심으로 / 영산신학저널 10
5. [단행본] - 밀리오리, 다니엘 L. / 1994 / 기독교 조직신학개론 / 한국장로교출판사
6. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 몰트만, 위르겐 / 2006 / 희망의 축복; 희망의 신학과 생명의 충만한 축복 / 영산신학저널 4
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김문기 / 2009 / 영산의 목회에 나타난 프랑케의 할레 경건주의 목회유형 / 영산신학저널 16
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김판호 / 2007 / 영산의 신학적 인간이해: 전인구원 중심으로 / 영산신학저널 10
5. [단행본] - 밀리오리, 다니엘 L. / 1994 / 기독교 조직신학개론 / 한국장로교출판사
6. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 몰트만, 위르겐 / 2006 / 희망의 축복; 희망의 신학과 생명의 충만한 축복 / 영산신학저널 4
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0