메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국기독교학회 한국기독교신학논총 한국기독교신학논총 제91집
발행연도
2014.1
수록면
5 - 32 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This essay compares Lefebvre`s notion of social space with Heidegger`s existential space, possibly with the latter influencing the former. For Lefebvre, while social space contains a great diversity of objects, both natural and social, it is not just a sum of these objects but the social relations inherent in them. Social labor transforms the objects. Such a social space consisting of social relations is already implied in Heideger`s notion of Being?in?the?World. For Heidegger, human Dasein is “in” the world, not in the categorical sense of insidedness but in the existential sense of being?in. Existential being?in means “to dwell near,” “to be familiar with,” that is, “being together with” (sein bei) the world. Thus, human Dasein and the world belong together (Zusammengehorigkeit). Heidegger sets the categorical space, which is present?at?hand” (Vorhandenheit), against the existential space, which is ready?to?hand (Zuhandenheit). Readiness? to?hand is the kind of being of equipment (Zeug), of which we take care (Besorgen). This essay notices that Heidegger`s spatiality of equipment implies Lefebvre`s labor, which produces social space. Lefebvre argues that spatial practice is lived before it is conceived. The primordial areas of perceived and lived spaces correspond to Heidegger`s world. From the lived space of representation, Lefebvre attempts to disclose the dominated people`s appropriation of space. This essay concludes with an analysis of a biblical passage (Luke 7:36?50), which shows a narrative appropriation of space, from the perspective of the existential and social space.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (4)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0