메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국기독교학회 한국기독교신학논총 한국기독교신학논총 제35집
발행연도
2004.10
수록면
127 - 154 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This article began with the story of my grandmother`s conversion. Which image of Jesus Christ became the object of her faith after conversion, however, is my critical point. I developed this article from this contextual point of view. In this article, I have been reflecting on the relationship between Christ and culture, especially regarding Bari. In order to construct a post colonial Christology I criticized a kind of orientalist image of Jesus as the blond, blue - eyed Caucasian and a kind of occidental image of Jesus as the Korean Goddess Bari in a shamanized Christology. Methodologically I used the blond, blue -eyed male Jesus as an Icon of the "Christ against Culture" and Bari as an Icon of the "Christ of Culture" . However I personally prefer the model of "Christ as transformer of Culture" in post - colonial discourse, since it implies neither a dualistic nor synthesistic idea of the relationship between Christ and culture. It reflects, rather a conversionist approach used in a dialectical way. Korean feminist Christology needs to be re -thought critically, while keeping in view Korean women` s heritage. Bari as Icon for Korean shamanism is a helpful figure for thinking about Korean identity, especially that of women. Furthermore, Bari could help to reopen our eyes to Korean religiosity. To reflect on our Asian religious cultural heritage is very important, especially for Asian feminist theology. Bari does not bring out the soteriological dimension of Christ. That`s the reason why the Korean spirits of the ancestors in general, including the Han ridden spirit of Bari, could not be icons of the Holy Spirit. This should be clarified from the perspective of the divine trinity. No cultural or socio - political context can of itself illuminate the meaning of Jesus Christ. The process of inculturation is very important, but Christ is the transformer of culture and not simply the expression of a culture. In this article I have not described any particular image of Christology for a post - colonial model, because both images and metaphors are limited, whether they are male or female. It is for this reason that I have put forward the image of living water as a non- personal symbolic term for Jesus Christ in this article. The living water that Bari was seeking was a gift of grace. If we were to use grammatical terms, Christ would be the subject and culture would be the object, including western Christian culture. For it is not culture which interprets Christ, but Christ who interprets and transforms culture. In other words, our culture and context should not be made the subject, because Christ is already active as subject in both culture and context. In other words I imply God` s incarnation in Jesus Christ, not a deification of Bari. I am not advocating any elevation and ascending of a mere human being for Korean Christology. We are not acting to accumulate "good deeds" in order to elevate ourselves as human beings. Rather, we are called to take action against multiple forms of oppression in this age of globalization. Our belief in Jesus Christ enables us to overcome the injustice inherent in sexism, racism and classism. Christian faith is caught up in the struggle to break the bondage of fate.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0