지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The first task planners were to take, when they started planning for Sejong City (the New Multi-functional Administrative City), was defining the visions of the New City. The idea of the New City was conceived to realize the national policy agenda of ‘Co-development & Leap forward’ and will be built to take on the image of Korea"s new future.
Under the idea the Korean Government set four objectives in the New City Project; to create ‘a Core City’ that formulates a new ‘global city region’ in the mid location of the Nation, to make ‘a Catalyst City’ that enhances the globalization level of other ‘city regions’; to provide ‘a Multi-functional City’ that facilitates the synergy between public and private sectors’ activities; to work as ‘a Pilot City’ that tests and disseminates all kinds of urban innovation.
With all four project objectives achieved, the following four aspects of urban vision, which represent the forthcoming social, political, technological, and cultural changes, were to be expected.
The New City will create ‘a Ubiquitous City’ that exhibits Korea’s leading edge in IT as well as flexibility and fluidity, ‘a Humane City’ with a keen sensitivity to diverse values of citizens and world visitors, ‘a Co-evolving City’ where nature, people, and urban functions make a dynamic equilibrium with sustainability, and ‘a Cultured City of Korean Urbanism’ in the East Asia with a creative interpretation of history and future.
However, it was not an easy task to realize this magnitude of objectives and visions through a physical planning, because both of them were very abstract in nature. Urban planning only could provide friendly environment to achieve them. The organizer regarded design competition as the most important strategy. They tried to mobilize all the design capacity from in and out of the country through design competitions.
The first international competition was held on urban ideas.
The winning idea was a sort of linear city forming a ringshape, which was barely executed in the real world. This idea brought several innovative concepts to the planning.
First of all, it means no city center at the heart of the city unlike ordinary cities, where most important city functions are concentrated on the center of the city.
In other words, Sejong City can be a balanced city where all the people have equal accessibility to the central axis. This idea also exactly corresponds with the President Rho’s political philosophy.
Linear form allows the city reduce energy consumption significantly. About 80 percents of the residents are living within a walking distance to the central axis. With the BRT line on the central axis, together with bicycle and pedestrian road system, people don’t have to drive their cars for transportation. Due to insufficient space for driving and parking, driving car can be stifling in the New City.
Another distinctive character of Sejong City is that the huge inner space of the ring was going to be preserved as natural and artificial open space which is almost equally accessible from all the direction of the city.
Under the idea the Korean Government set four objectives in the New City Project; to create ‘a Core City’ that formulates a new ‘global city region’ in the mid location of the Nation, to make ‘a Catalyst City’ that enhances the globalization level of other ‘city regions’; to provide ‘a Multi-functional City’ that facilitates the synergy between public and private sectors’ activities; to work as ‘a Pilot City’ that tests and disseminates all kinds of urban innovation.
With all four project objectives achieved, the following four aspects of urban vision, which represent the forthcoming social, political, technological, and cultural changes, were to be expected.
The New City will create ‘a Ubiquitous City’ that exhibits Korea’s leading edge in IT as well as flexibility and fluidity, ‘a Humane City’ with a keen sensitivity to diverse values of citizens and world visitors, ‘a Co-evolving City’ where nature, people, and urban functions make a dynamic equilibrium with sustainability, and ‘a Cultured City of Korean Urbanism’ in the East Asia with a creative interpretation of history and future.
However, it was not an easy task to realize this magnitude of objectives and visions through a physical planning, because both of them were very abstract in nature. Urban planning only could provide friendly environment to achieve them. The organizer regarded design competition as the most important strategy. They tried to mobilize all the design capacity from in and out of the country through design competitions.
The first international competition was held on urban ideas.
The winning idea was a sort of linear city forming a ringshape, which was barely executed in the real world. This idea brought several innovative concepts to the planning.
First of all, it means no city center at the heart of the city unlike ordinary cities, where most important city functions are concentrated on the center of the city.
In other words, Sejong City can be a balanced city where all the people have equal accessibility to the central axis. This idea also exactly corresponds with the President Rho’s political philosophy.
Linear form allows the city reduce energy consumption significantly. About 80 percents of the residents are living within a walking distance to the central axis. With the BRT line on the central axis, together with bicycle and pedestrian road system, people don’t have to drive their cars for transportation. Due to insufficient space for driving and parking, driving car can be stifling in the New City.
Another distinctive character of Sejong City is that the huge inner space of the ring was going to be preserved as natural and artificial open space which is almost equally accessible from all the direction of the city.
목차
행정중심복합도시의 정책 목표
행정중심복합도시의 비전
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
U-City 활성화를 위한 유비쿼터스도시의 건설 등에 관한 법률의 개정방향
한국공간정보학회지
2015 .08
-
U-City 고도화를 위한 수준진단체계 개발방향에 관한 연구
대한공간정보학회지
2015 .06
-
도시권 특성이 축소도시에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구
국토계획
2022 .11
-
지자체 U-City 수준진단체계 평가지표
한국ITS학회 논문지
2016 .01
-
행복도시 세종, 도시경관 및 도시디자인의 차별성
건축
2015 .02
-
세종시의 지속가능한 발전전략
건축
2015 .02
-
[발언과 논평] 보이지 않는 도시들 : 도시와 욕망
건축
2017 .06
-
물과 도시
대한토목학회지
2015 .10
-
자율주행 실험도시(K-City) 1단계 구축 및 고도화 계획
오토저널
2019 .06
-
[프로젝트 리포트] 순천시 신청사, 순천의로(順天懿路)
건축
2022 .04
-
U-City 활성화를 위한 법제도 개선방향에 관한 연구
대한공간정보학회 학술대회
2015 .05
-
A Study on Smart City in Our Life Space on Actual Cases
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND CONVERGENCE
2016 .07
-
지역 거점도시 식별 및 상호작용에 따른 영향권역 설정에 관한 연구
국토계획
2018 .12
-
유비쿼터스도시종합계획과 유비쿼터스도시계획 비교 연구 -U-서비스 계획을 중심으로-
한국공간정보학회지
2015 .04
-
도시관리 IT시스템 분석
대한공간정보학회 학술대회
2022 .05
-
도시의 새로운 미래
건축
2023 .03
-
Management of urban smart systems
Smart Structures and Systems, An International Journal
2022 .09
-
A Study on Strategies of Smart Green City : The Priority Analysis and Application of Planning Technique
KIEAE Journal
2015 .04
-
행복한 건축과 도시공간을 향한 추구: 행복도시 총괄기획가의 경험
건축
2015 .02
-
1950년대 근대계획도시의 도시형태 및 공간적 특성에 관한 연구 : 찬디가르와 브라질리아 계획도시를 중심으로
KIEAE Journal
2016 .08
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-540-001278902