지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국일본어학회 일본어학연구 일본어학연구 제42집
- 발행연도
- 2014.12
- 수록면
- 57 - 74 (18page)
- DOI
- 10.14817/jlak.2014.42.57
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper is a study of syntax of "nanari" and "nameri" in Genzi′s story. These phrases "nanari" and "nameri" consist of the declarative auxiliary verb "nari" and the suppositional auxiliary verb "nari" and "meri", respectively. The paper clarifies the syntactic features of "nanari" and "nameri" by comparing them with the declarative modality in Nita (2009).
"Nanari" is in general used as a predicate. There is no evidence that it was used in the past form. Further, it was not used as a predicate in a noun-modifying clause and its use as a predicate within a subordinate clause was also restricted. It can be used with "omohu". It can also be used with the appropriateness modality and explanation modality. When used with the explanation modality, "nanari" is located behind the explanation modality. In summary "nanari" is similar to Nita′s "Guess".
"Nameri" is also in general used as a predicate. However, there is evidence that "nanari" was used as the past form. It was also used in modifying-noun clauses although there were some limits. It can be used as a predicate in a variety of subordinate clauses. Further, it can be used with "omohu". It can be used with the appropriateness modality and the explanation modality. When used with the explanation modality, "nanari" is located behind the explanation modality. In summary "nanari" is similar to Nita′s "Judgment from probability".
There is are distinct differences between "nanari" and "Guess", as well as between "nameri" and "Judgment from probability", respectively. "Guess" and “Judgment from probability" may be used with a conditional phrase, whereas "nanari" and "nameri" may be not. It is possible to use "Judgment from probability" in combination with "Guess", but it is impossible in the case of "nanari" and "nameri", i.e they cannot be combined with each other. "Nanari" is possible to use with aural information. In criticisms or comments of the story narrator, only "nameri" is used and "nanari" is not.
"Nanari" is in general used as a predicate. There is no evidence that it was used in the past form. Further, it was not used as a predicate in a noun-modifying clause and its use as a predicate within a subordinate clause was also restricted. It can be used with "omohu". It can also be used with the appropriateness modality and explanation modality. When used with the explanation modality, "nanari" is located behind the explanation modality. In summary "nanari" is similar to Nita′s "Guess".
"Nameri" is also in general used as a predicate. However, there is evidence that "nanari" was used as the past form. It was also used in modifying-noun clauses although there were some limits. It can be used as a predicate in a variety of subordinate clauses. Further, it can be used with "omohu". It can be used with the appropriateness modality and the explanation modality. When used with the explanation modality, "nanari" is located behind the explanation modality. In summary "nanari" is similar to Nita′s "Judgment from probability".
There is are distinct differences between "nanari" and "Guess", as well as between "nameri" and "Judgment from probability", respectively. "Guess" and “Judgment from probability" may be used with a conditional phrase, whereas "nanari" and "nameri" may be not. It is possible to use "Judgment from probability" in combination with "Guess", but it is impossible in the case of "nanari" and "nameri", i.e they cannot be combined with each other. "Nanari" is possible to use with aural information. In criticisms or comments of the story narrator, only "nameri" is used and "nanari" is not.
목차
Abstract
1. 연구목적
2. 선행연구
3.「ななり」와 「なめり」의 통사구조
4. 『源氏物語』의 「ななり」와 「なめり」의 의미적 특징
5. 결론
참고문헌
요지
참고문헌 (13)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - 内尾久美 / 1986 / 古典語現代語助詞助動詞詳説 / 学燈社 : 653 ~ 654
2. [단행본] - 北原保雄 / 1966 / 国語と国文学 : 55 ~ 71
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 小松光三 / 1982 / 『ななり』『なめり』『なりけり』の意味機能 / 愛媛国文研究 20 : 15 ~ 27
4. [학술대회논문] - 柴田敏 / 1994 / ナナリとナメリの<判断>について / 言語·文学·国語教育 森野宗明教授退官記念論集 : 33 ~ 45
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 杉村泰 / 2002 / 続·カモシレナイとニチガイナイの異質性ーコーパス調査の結果からー / 名古屋大学言語文化論集 : 261 ~ 276
2. [단행본] - 北原保雄 / 1966 / 国語と国文学 : 55 ~ 71
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 小松光三 / 1982 / 『ななり』『なめり』『なりけり』の意味機能 / 愛媛国文研究 20 : 15 ~ 27
4. [학술대회논문] - 柴田敏 / 1994 / ナナリとナメリの<判断>について / 言語·文学·国語教育 森野宗明教授退官記念論集 : 33 ~ 45
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 杉村泰 / 2002 / 続·カモシレナイとニチガイナイの異質性ーコーパス調査の結果からー / 名古屋大学言語文化論集 : 261 ~ 276
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-730-001077101