지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The recently published report by the World Economic Forum shows that the Republic of Korea has recorded very low scores in all the items of the “Labor Market Efficiency.” In light of the rigidity of dismissal of workers on “ground of business management” under the present Labor Standard Act and the unstableness of the labor market, notwithstanding the benefits of tax reductions or exemptions, etc., the present labor-management related provisions under the Free Economic Zone Act are not sufficient to solicit or induce foreign companies to make investment in the free economic zones.”
This article seeks to consider relevant useful provisions of foreign countries" legal systems evaluated to flexibly have coped with the labor-management relations within their free economic zones, and review in depth appropriate methods to improve relevant provisions for domestic laws. In front of the global competitive system, such provisions should conform to not only domestic laws but also the fundamental right to work established by the International Labor Organization or relevant provisions of the effective Free Trade Agreements, and further the provisions should not have any problem or at least should not be cited to be problematic under the international norms.
As for general laws, it should be undesirable or unfeasible to dramatically convert the principle of “employment at will” or “no regulation” into the provisions of the Labor Standard Act, considering the current domestic labor conditions. Also introducing the Singapore-typed system of the “Industrial Arbitration Court” is highly likely to run counter to the guarantees of fundamental rights of workers. As for special laws, it seems desirable to establish guidelines in detail under the Free Economic Zones regarding the “Early Retirement Program” or some other mechanisms frequently proposed to business people in practice. In addition, pursuant to the current relevant provisions of the Free Economic Zones Act, it is worth facilitating counselor programs for foreign-invested companies.
This article seeks to consider relevant useful provisions of foreign countries" legal systems evaluated to flexibly have coped with the labor-management relations within their free economic zones, and review in depth appropriate methods to improve relevant provisions for domestic laws. In front of the global competitive system, such provisions should conform to not only domestic laws but also the fundamental right to work established by the International Labor Organization or relevant provisions of the effective Free Trade Agreements, and further the provisions should not have any problem or at least should not be cited to be problematic under the international norms.
As for general laws, it should be undesirable or unfeasible to dramatically convert the principle of “employment at will” or “no regulation” into the provisions of the Labor Standard Act, considering the current domestic labor conditions. Also introducing the Singapore-typed system of the “Industrial Arbitration Court” is highly likely to run counter to the guarantees of fundamental rights of workers. As for special laws, it seems desirable to establish guidelines in detail under the Free Economic Zones regarding the “Early Retirement Program” or some other mechanisms frequently proposed to business people in practice. In addition, pursuant to the current relevant provisions of the Free Economic Zones Act, it is worth facilitating counselor programs for foreign-invested companies.
#경제자유구역 규제 개혁
#경제자유구역 고용유연화
#경제자유구역 외국인기업 유치
#경제자유구역 노사분쟁 해결
#경제자유구역 법률 제정 및 개정
#Regulatory reforms on free economic zones
#flexible employment for free economic zones
#foreign-invested companies for free economic zones
#resolution of labor disputes on free economic zones
#enactment and amendment of laws for free economic zones
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 국내의 관련 규정
Ⅲ. 국제 기준
Ⅳ. 미국의 입법례
Ⅴ. 입법적인 대안
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-336-001080406