지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Communist Party of China has considered religion something that had to be eradicated from the society based on the philosophy of Marx, Lenin, and Mao Tse-tung. The 1980’s Open Door policy in China was a turning point in the regulation of religion. Starting from reflection on Marxism, the government encouraged research on religion instead of promoting the atheist policy. As a result, the beginning of the Open Door policy permitted the most freedom of religious belief since the Communist Party had been established, emphasizing economical development than regulation.
However, the government turns back to the religious perspectives of Marx, Lenin, and Mao Tse-tung after it successfully hosted the 2008 Summer Olympic Games, with China’s increasing importance in the world’s economy. Scholars also share interests with the leading political party as beneficiaries of the economic development, thereby supporting the regulation of religious freedom. Although freedom of religion in China is provided for by the country’s constitution, members of the officially atheist Communist Party are strongly discouraged from holding religious faith - they cannot hold any religious belief, and they can be forced to bolt from the party when they are found. Thus, the government’s statements such as “religion and communism need to and can collaborate”, and “the government protects freedom of religion” are mere slogans that consider the domestic political need of the Communist Party rather than actual policies.
However, the government turns back to the religious perspectives of Marx, Lenin, and Mao Tse-tung after it successfully hosted the 2008 Summer Olympic Games, with China’s increasing importance in the world’s economy. Scholars also share interests with the leading political party as beneficiaries of the economic development, thereby supporting the regulation of religious freedom. Although freedom of religion in China is provided for by the country’s constitution, members of the officially atheist Communist Party are strongly discouraged from holding religious faith - they cannot hold any religious belief, and they can be forced to bolt from the party when they are found. Thus, the government’s statements such as “religion and communism need to and can collaborate”, and “the government protects freedom of religion” are mere slogans that consider the domestic political need of the Communist Party rather than actual policies.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 중국의 종교정책 그 태생적 한계론의 제기
Ⅲ. 종교소멸론과 종교오성론
Ⅳ. 종교와 사회주의 적응론
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (46)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 강준영 / 2003 / 중국 개혁개방과 종교의 부활 / 중국학연구 24 : 309 ~ 340
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 류성민 / 2007 / 한중일 삼국의 종교정책 비교 / 종교연구 (46집) : 37 ~ 77
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 오재환 / 2003 / 개방 20년 기간 중국 종교 정책의 변화 / 중국학보 48 : 483 ~
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 오재환 / 2004 / 개방 이후 중국 종교와 종교학 / 종교연구 통권 (34집) : 259 ~ 288
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 吳 在 環 / 2005 / ‘五四’時期 以來 中國知識人의 宗敎觀 / 중국근현대사연구 (27) : 99 ~ 120
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 류성민 / 2007 / 한중일 삼국의 종교정책 비교 / 종교연구 (46집) : 37 ~ 77
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 오재환 / 2003 / 개방 20년 기간 중국 종교 정책의 변화 / 중국학보 48 : 483 ~
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 오재환 / 2004 / 개방 이후 중국 종교와 종교학 / 종교연구 통권 (34집) : 259 ~ 288
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 吳 在 環 / 2005 / ‘五四’時期 以來 中國知識人의 宗敎觀 / 중국근현대사연구 (27) : 99 ~ 120
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-912-001085683