지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The study analyzed the accident happened in the DMZ Anticommunist POW Camp after signing an Armistice agreement. The Neutral Nations Repatriation Commission(NNRC) was organized in order to resolve the problems of non-repatriation prisoners of war after signing an Armistice agreement and the Custodian Force India(CFI) was mobilized for direct management of POWs. The POWs were transferred to the DMZ and the NNRC’s Indian delegates and the CFI entered the Korean peninsula. However, the Korean government had hostility toward the Indian government since the Korean War and banned them from entering the South Korean territory as they landed on the Korean Peninsula. Therefore, the Indian delegates and the CFI had to move to the DMZ using the US Air Force aircraft. And the POWs in the Anticommunist POW Camp were in confrontation with the CFI as they thought they were pro-communist. In this circumstance, the CFI’s massacre of anticommunist POWs was occurred on the first and the second day of October. Korean government officials and political parties blamed the CFI for the case on the public press and the Korean national assembly organized a committee for fact finding. In addition the Taiwanese government appealed to the international society through demonstrations and rally and encouraged Chinese living in Korea to carry on the movement to oust the CFI. The United States has focused on the Korean situation and the atmosphere in India and the case was covered up with the US’s mediation. Later, two trials were opened regarding Chinese POWs and Korean POWs at the Camp. Regarding the first case, charge was withdrawn as the court could not proceed with the transfer of the witnesses to the Communist army. The second case could not proceed further as the trial period was extended but the date for the release of the POWs approached. At the time when the trial on the case proceeded, the Korean government argued that the Indian army did not have the judicial power to process the trial on the POWs but the Indian army ignored the argument. Later on January 21st, 1954 all the POWs were released and the POWs who were charged were also released one month later and returned to Korea and Taiwan. And the NNRC was dismissed and the CFI returned to India.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 정전협정 체결과 미송환 포로의 비무장지대 이동
Ⅲ. 인도관리군의 반공포로 학살사건
Ⅳ. 반공포로의 재판, 포로 석방과 인도관리군의 귀국
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (25)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-300-001050197