지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This dissertation is a study on an unusual aspect of the Korean War - the existence of prisoners of war (POW) who, rather than being repatriated, were allowed to go to third countries after the armistice. It will focus on the process through which this came to be, and point out the main features of this arrangement.
During the Korean War, UN Forces and the Communist Forces were locked in battle over the number of Prisoners of war. The armistice talks ended with an agreement that the issue of POWs refusing repatriation be decided by the NNRC, working under the principle of voluntary repatriation.
These POWs were supposed to be granted a free choice following a 4-month period of ‘explanation’. In reality only one-tenth of them were given ‘explanations’ ; the rest had to express their choice by resorting to extreme measures. POWs who chose third countries underwent the same process, but with the added difficulty of having to face the discouragement of Camp authorities and their fellow POWs. The reality which did not provide the POWs with a more open atmosphere would have made more POWs favor third countries.
Choosing to go to third countries was not, in itself, a choice for a certain ideology. What the POWs wished was to escape from the situation in which ideologies competing with each other eventually manifested themselves in the form of a violent war and grueling prisoner camps.
During the Korean War, UN Forces and the Communist Forces were locked in battle over the number of Prisoners of war. The armistice talks ended with an agreement that the issue of POWs refusing repatriation be decided by the NNRC, working under the principle of voluntary repatriation.
These POWs were supposed to be granted a free choice following a 4-month period of ‘explanation’. In reality only one-tenth of them were given ‘explanations’ ; the rest had to express their choice by resorting to extreme measures. POWs who chose third countries underwent the same process, but with the added difficulty of having to face the discouragement of Camp authorities and their fellow POWs. The reality which did not provide the POWs with a more open atmosphere would have made more POWs favor third countries.
Choosing to go to third countries was not, in itself, a choice for a certain ideology. What the POWs wished was to escape from the situation in which ideologies competing with each other eventually manifested themselves in the form of a violent war and grueling prisoner camps.
목차
머리말
1. 송환 거부 포로를 둘러싼 논쟁과 처리 과정
2. 송환 거부 포로 설득(Explanation)과 중립국 선택 포로의 발생
3. 중립국 선택의 실체 : 배경ㆍ과정ㆍ결과
맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (25)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-910-001015958