메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김미영 (이화여대) 박종희 (고려대학교)
저널정보
한국노동법학회 노동법학 노동법학 제52호
발행연도
2014.12
수록면
221 - 253 (33page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The Civil Rights Act(1991) has introduced the compensatory and punitive damages in intentional discrimination cases. Before the Act, an individual, who suffered from employment discriminations only could file a petition for equitable reliefs in the EEOC. Because state courts, having jurisdiction over the damages claims, can’t hear cases from the Act that is enacted by the legislative power of the U.S. Congress under the federal preemption of the Constitution. The punitive damages itself, however, was not created by the Act(1991) but the damages have been recognized as a judicial relief by common law courts since the late 19th century. The punitive damages is a criminal penalty awarded by the civil procedures, which is a kind of primitive remedy from the view of the civil law system. Then, today, even the American judges would be reluctant to decide the damages in civil lawsuits.
To conclude, There are doubts about whether the punitive damages would work well with the Korean legal system that has kept the remedies separating the criminal reliefs from the civil reliefs. The punitive damages is awarded by the civil procedures, but is a criminal remedy for the purpose of punishing a wrongdoer and restricting the similar unlawful actions in the future. The Korean civil laws don’t have any institutional history about the punitive damages in the civil procedures. Then, if the punitive damages are introduced on a legislation by the National Assembly, it would mean that the legislature creates totally new judicial relief for the civil lawsuit. Above all it is difficult to expect that Korean judges would properly interpret and enforce the legislation including the punitive damages, even though the legislature could succeed in enacting it.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 고용차별 행위 구제수단으로서 손해배상제도의 역사
Ⅲ. 시민권법(1991)의 징벌적 손해배상제도의 원리와 해석
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (14)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0