지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (6)
2014
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper reviews the recognition of the Ulleungdo-Dokdo islands by the Japanese government during the Meiji era through an analysis of the meaning of the term “Takeshima and one island” in the Dajokan Order, which was written by the Takeshima Study Group in Shimane-ken. The results of the analysis were as follows. First, the term “one island” was insisted upon by the Takeshima Study Group, and it was based on Kawakami Kenzo’s confused theory about the name “Dokdo.” However, the term does not actually include Ulleungdo, which has been called both Takeshima (Ulleungdo) and Matsushima (Dokdo), but rather refers only to the island of Dokdo. This interpretation is clear in the phrase Takeshima-gai-itto, meaning “Takeshima (Ulleungdo) and one island,” which traditionally refers to Takeshima or Matsushima (Dokdo). Second, another phrase found in the Daijokan Order, Iso-takeshima-Ryakuzu, obviously refers to Takeshima-gai-itto. It specifically includes Iso Takeshima (Ulleungdo) and Matsushima (Dokdo), which clearly shows that it is the “one island” of Matsushima (Dokdo). Third, Shimane-ken mentioned the “one island” of Songdo (Dokdo) when the Japanese Ministry of Domestic Affairs first sent them a letter to inquire about a map published by the local government. In this letter, the documentation of Takeshima-Kankeishiryo by Shimane-ken clearly recorded Matsushima (Dokdo) as the “one island.” Fourth, analysis of the names used for the Ulleungdo-Dokdo islands during the Meiji era by each Japanese ministry and council, especially by the Ministries of Domestic Affairs and Foreign Affairs and the Daijokan, shows that they recognized Ulleungdo as Takeshima and Dokdo as Matsushima without any confusion. This paper shows that the various Japanese ministries used these different names for the islands with no confusion.
목차
서론
제1장 태정관지령문 「죽도외일도」의 해석을 둘러싸고
제2장 태정관지령문의「죽도외일도」와 그 내용
제3장 메이지 시대 일본 정부의 울릉도·독도 인식
결론
참고문헌
논문초록
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-910-002857101