개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Analyzed in this article is the “Re-traditionalization” process which appeared in the rural communities of Korea after the Korean war, as it would definitely help us understand the characteristics of the Korean society. This “Re-traditionalization” phenomenon that occurred in the rural areas is ordinarily considered as a process of becoming fairly conservative in a political sense, yet it should also be considered as a phenomenon in which traditional authority and values were ‘reinforced’ on a social and cultural level. Yet this may not have been a simple return to the old ways, as it rather seems like an ideological strategy devised by the peasants who were facing an anomic situation after the devastating experience that was the Korean war.
The peasantry population, which was forced to experience a horrific war, could not maintain a revolutionary attitude and aspiration that they once had before, and at the same time was not ready to embrace and accept the Western style of life pouring in from the cities So, the only thing they could turn to was the familiar traditional way of life, through which they expected to reestablish mutual cooperation and unity in community. This “Re-traditionalization” was not a trend that went against the grand wave of modernization, but was a unique response to it and even a modernized answer to it from the rural communities.
Then again, behind such “Re-traditionalization” process, there was another kind of energy developing as well, which was a new generation of youngsters who were under modern influences. We can say that the rural society of Korea after the war were showing two flows of life, the “Re-traditionalized” way of life, and an entirely new kind of “modern life,” encountering each other, fighting each other, and merging with each other, to find an eventual balance which would help them all to overcome the anomic state of things and find a new order of life.
The peasantry population, which was forced to experience a horrific war, could not maintain a revolutionary attitude and aspiration that they once had before, and at the same time was not ready to embrace and accept the Western style of life pouring in from the cities So, the only thing they could turn to was the familiar traditional way of life, through which they expected to reestablish mutual cooperation and unity in community. This “Re-traditionalization” was not a trend that went against the grand wave of modernization, but was a unique response to it and even a modernized answer to it from the rural communities.
Then again, behind such “Re-traditionalization” process, there was another kind of energy developing as well, which was a new generation of youngsters who were under modern influences. We can say that the rural society of Korea after the war were showing two flows of life, the “Re-traditionalized” way of life, and an entirely new kind of “modern life,” encountering each other, fighting each other, and merging with each other, to find an eventual balance which would help them all to overcome the anomic state of things and find a new order of life.
목차
머리말
1. 해방~전쟁 시기 지역사회의 격동 -열린 공간에서 치솟는 주변부의 힘
2. 전후 지역사회의 권력구조 ―전통적 권위 질서의 회복
3. 전후 지역사회의 저변 ―재전통화와 새로운 에너지의 교직
맺음말
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
한국 재벌과 ‘무책임의 경제’
장진호
역사비평
2014
.08
5·18 항쟁의 배경과 참여세력 : 광주 지역 민주화운동세력을 중심으로
노영기
역사와현실
2013
.09
박정희정권기 국토계획의 전개 과정과 동해안지역의 위상
신용옥
도서문화
2013
.06
전통과 근대 : 한국의 유교적 근대성 논의를 중심으로
나종석
사회와 철학
2015
.10
우리 안의 ‘과거’, 1960년을 낯설게 혹은 다르게 읽는 법 : 권보드래·천정환 저, 『1960년을 묻다』(천년의상상, 2012)와 이하나, 『대한민국, 재건의 시대』(푸른역사, 2013)의 문화사적 함의들
공임순
역사와현실
2014
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-910-002725260