지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The CISG is most affected by the UCC. But there are several differences between two laws if we take a closer look at them. This study examines about legal issues regarding formation of the contracts in both laws.
The CISG and the UCC accept the typical rule that a contract is established by a offer and an acceptance. According to the CISG Article 14, the offer must be definite, specific and having intent to be bound. Determinability requirement of price in an offer is retreated in Article 55. As a result, relationship between the Article 14 and Article 55 is in dispute. Otherwise the UCC liberalize the degree of definiteness required for contract.
The CISG and the UCC recognize the revocability of an offer. In the CISG Article 16, an offerer can revoke an offer until an offeree makes an acceptance. Article 16 restricts the offerer’s power to revoke in two situations, also : making a promise that the offer is irrevocable and the offeree acts in reliance on the promise. According to the UCC 2-205, the only situation where the offer is irrevocable is that the offer makes a firm offer.
The CISG and the UCC change the common law rule so called mirror image rule, but there are differences in the way of treating an acceptance with modifications in the CISG and the UCC. According to the CISG, an acceptance contains immaterial differences constitutes an acceptance unless the offerer objects to the discrepancy and those modifications are included as the terms of the contracts. In the UCC, in case of between merchants, the additional terms become part of the contract unless (1) the offer expressly limits acceptance to the terms of the offer, (2) they materially alter it, or (3) notification if objection to them has already been given or is given within a reasonable time after notice of them is received.
The CISG and the UCC accept the typical rule that a contract is established by a offer and an acceptance. According to the CISG Article 14, the offer must be definite, specific and having intent to be bound. Determinability requirement of price in an offer is retreated in Article 55. As a result, relationship between the Article 14 and Article 55 is in dispute. Otherwise the UCC liberalize the degree of definiteness required for contract.
The CISG and the UCC recognize the revocability of an offer. In the CISG Article 16, an offerer can revoke an offer until an offeree makes an acceptance. Article 16 restricts the offerer’s power to revoke in two situations, also : making a promise that the offer is irrevocable and the offeree acts in reliance on the promise. According to the UCC 2-205, the only situation where the offer is irrevocable is that the offer makes a firm offer.
The CISG and the UCC change the common law rule so called mirror image rule, but there are differences in the way of treating an acceptance with modifications in the CISG and the UCC. According to the CISG, an acceptance contains immaterial differences constitutes an acceptance unless the offerer objects to the discrepancy and those modifications are included as the terms of the contracts. In the UCC, in case of between merchants, the additional terms become part of the contract unless (1) the offer expressly limits acceptance to the terms of the offer, (2) they materially alter it, or (3) notification if objection to them has already been given or is given within a reasonable time after notice of them is received.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. CISG에서의 국제물품매매계약의 성립
Ⅲ. UCC 제2편에서의 물품매매계약의 성립 및 CISG와의 비교
Ⅳ. 결론
【참고문헌】
【Abstract】
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
국제물품매매계약에서 Incoterms(2010)의 활용과 그 보충에 관한 연구
오원석
,
김동호
무역학회지
2013
.04
Incoterms 2010의 운송계약조항에 관한 연구
전순환
무역학회지
2012
.04
개정 미국통일상법전(UCC) 제2편(물품매매)의 비교법적 고찰 : 서식전쟁(Battle of Forms) 부분을 중심으로
정홍식
비교사법
2010
.06
국제물품매매계약에서의 서면요건에 대한 고찰 : 미국계약법과 CISG 비교를 중심으로
하충룡
통상정보연구
2012
.12
CISG에서 청약에 관한 연구
하충룡
,
고승만
무역학회지
2011
.02
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-300-002739300