지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2011.11
- 수록면
- 1 - 162 (162page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Agricultural trade between Korea and China shows a clear one-way trade from China to Korea and consists mainly of inter-industry trade. The products available to intra-industry trade are rare with the exception of several processed foods. This overwhelmingly unbalanced trade structure makes it difficult for the two countries to avoid severe competition and build a mutually beneficial cooperative relationship in agricultural sector, and is not expected to change in the near future.
Since the establishment of diplomatic relations between Korea and China in 1992, the share of grain in their bilateral agricultural trade has decreased, but the shares of vegetables and processed foods have increased. The pattern will set in because grain trade is quite restrictive to the supply and demand in the Chinese domestic market and most of fruits, vegetables, and livestock products trade are not allowed to trade because of inspection and quarantine barriers, which is not expected to be completely removed in the near future.
The implications from our analyses on relevant issues in the agricultural trade structure between Korea and China are summarized as follows:
First, Chinese agriculture is now on the stage of labor productivity-led growth and changes its production structure to the one relying on intermediate inputs gradually. Hence, the rises of input prices including agricultural wage and land rent are likely to threaten the price competitiveness of Chinese agricultural export.
Second, China is a young market economy and the economy is not yet sophisticated enough due to the government"s frequent interventionist economic policies. Most of all, China still clings to the socialist system in politics. Thus, resource allocation in Chinese agricultural sector would be distorted by other factors rather than market principles. In this case, the prospect that the structural change in Chinese agriculture will follow a stylized path, through which developed countries already passed, will lead to a mistaken prediction of its change and then fail to properly act in the light of Korean agricultural sector.
Third, the two countries have a similar production structure and a development course of agriculture, but also have distinctive resource endowments and growth stages, which led to the current overwhelming one-way trade that is expected to leave not much room for a complementary relation in the near future. It is necessary to find constructive cooperation plans between the trading partners towards co-prosperity under a more liberalized trade in the future, focusing on the establishment of a specialization system reflecting their comparative advantages in agricultural production.
Since the establishment of diplomatic relations between Korea and China in 1992, the share of grain in their bilateral agricultural trade has decreased, but the shares of vegetables and processed foods have increased. The pattern will set in because grain trade is quite restrictive to the supply and demand in the Chinese domestic market and most of fruits, vegetables, and livestock products trade are not allowed to trade because of inspection and quarantine barriers, which is not expected to be completely removed in the near future.
The implications from our analyses on relevant issues in the agricultural trade structure between Korea and China are summarized as follows:
First, Chinese agriculture is now on the stage of labor productivity-led growth and changes its production structure to the one relying on intermediate inputs gradually. Hence, the rises of input prices including agricultural wage and land rent are likely to threaten the price competitiveness of Chinese agricultural export.
Second, China is a young market economy and the economy is not yet sophisticated enough due to the government"s frequent interventionist economic policies. Most of all, China still clings to the socialist system in politics. Thus, resource allocation in Chinese agricultural sector would be distorted by other factors rather than market principles. In this case, the prospect that the structural change in Chinese agriculture will follow a stylized path, through which developed countries already passed, will lead to a mistaken prediction of its change and then fail to properly act in the light of Korean agricultural sector.
Third, the two countries have a similar production structure and a development course of agriculture, but also have distinctive resource endowments and growth stages, which led to the current overwhelming one-way trade that is expected to leave not much room for a complementary relation in the near future. It is necessary to find constructive cooperation plans between the trading partners towards co-prosperity under a more liberalized trade in the future, focusing on the establishment of a specialization system reflecting their comparative advantages in agricultural production.
목차
[표지]
[목차]
표목차
그림목차
[요약]
[ABSTRACT]
[제1장 서론]
1. 연구의 필요성
2. 연구의 목적
3. 선행연구 검토
4. 연구 내용 및 방법
[제2장 중국 농업의 성장과 위상 변화]
1. 경제성장과 농업의 비중 변화
2. 농업 생산성의 변화
3. 농업 성장경로 분석
[제3장 중국 농업의 구조 변화]
1. 농업 투입 및 산출의 변화
2. 농업생산구조의 변화
3. 농업경영구조의 변화
[제4장 중국의 농업구조 변화 요인]
1. 가격 및 수익성 요인
2. 소비 요인
3. 정책 요인
[제5장 중국의 농업구조 변화와 한·중 농산물 교역]
1. 중국의 농산물 교역
2. 한·중 농산물 교역구조
3. 한·중 농산물 교역 전망
[제6장 요약 및 결론]
1. 요약
2. 결론
[참고 문헌]
[머리말]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-520-002536810