지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2013.12
- 수록면
- 1 - 227 (227page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
There exist some criticisms of agricultural and rural policy in terms of policy continuity that include unexpected policy changes according to replacement of government or minister, discordance among policy factors causing inconsistency, and lack of consistency between central government and local government occurring in the process of policy delivery. The purpose of this study is to find the problems concerning the discontinuity of policy implementation system and to suggest organization directions to improve reliability, efficiency and rationality of the agricultural and rural policy in the view of policy continuity.
For this research, we examined relevant laws and policies and performed a literature review concerning the policy implementation conditions with respect to policy continuity or policy consistency. We also carried out interviews with several mayors and local government officials in search of local conditions and problems pertaining to continuity of policy implementation. Analysis about a particular policy case(Agricultural policy) and a project case(New-vitality project) was performed as well. In order to evaluate the present policy conditions and to find clues to seek the improvement directions, we conducted first and second round delphi surveys constituting a professional panel of thirty persons in the agricultural and rural policy field. Lastly, using Q-methodology, we tried to draw several important discourses among the professionals and utilized the analytical result to obtain useful perspectives and to check the research direction.
From the results of this study, we suggested organization directions and challenges of agricultural and rural policy for the improvement of policy continuity. The organization directions we propose include; (ⅰ) to simplify the planning system, (ⅱ) to establish a medium or long-term integrated plan which has binding power by means of strengthening the linkage between planning and the budget, (ⅲ) practical constitution and management of committees at each level of government, (ⅳ) to assure that national and local government organizations in charge of agricultural and rural policy maintain responsibilities for a certain period of time, (ⅴ) management of special account, (ⅵ) to expand grants tailored to the particularities of different cases, (ⅶ) to amend the implementation guidelines for agricultural and forestry programs, (ⅷ) to reinforce the evaluation of the outcomes of agricultural and rural policies and the feedback process based on the evaluation results.
Policy continuity doesn"t necessarily mean that a certain policy should continue unconditionally. A policy that is out of social and economic validity or that has uncertain outcomes must be revised or terminated. But if a policy is determined based on the right demand and consensus, it is important to organize the implementation system assuring effective and efficient implementation of the policy for a certain period of time. The organization of the system includes modifying the system of laws and plans, reorganizing the organizations responsible for agricultural and rural policy, carrying out budget projects, and allocating effective roles among central government, local government, and private-sector bodies, etc. As the result of those efforts, it would be possible to enhance the policy outcomes and establish policy credibility.
For this research, we examined relevant laws and policies and performed a literature review concerning the policy implementation conditions with respect to policy continuity or policy consistency. We also carried out interviews with several mayors and local government officials in search of local conditions and problems pertaining to continuity of policy implementation. Analysis about a particular policy case(Agricultural policy) and a project case(New-vitality project) was performed as well. In order to evaluate the present policy conditions and to find clues to seek the improvement directions, we conducted first and second round delphi surveys constituting a professional panel of thirty persons in the agricultural and rural policy field. Lastly, using Q-methodology, we tried to draw several important discourses among the professionals and utilized the analytical result to obtain useful perspectives and to check the research direction.
From the results of this study, we suggested organization directions and challenges of agricultural and rural policy for the improvement of policy continuity. The organization directions we propose include; (ⅰ) to simplify the planning system, (ⅱ) to establish a medium or long-term integrated plan which has binding power by means of strengthening the linkage between planning and the budget, (ⅲ) practical constitution and management of committees at each level of government, (ⅳ) to assure that national and local government organizations in charge of agricultural and rural policy maintain responsibilities for a certain period of time, (ⅴ) management of special account, (ⅵ) to expand grants tailored to the particularities of different cases, (ⅶ) to amend the implementation guidelines for agricultural and forestry programs, (ⅷ) to reinforce the evaluation of the outcomes of agricultural and rural policies and the feedback process based on the evaluation results.
Policy continuity doesn"t necessarily mean that a certain policy should continue unconditionally. A policy that is out of social and economic validity or that has uncertain outcomes must be revised or terminated. But if a policy is determined based on the right demand and consensus, it is important to organize the implementation system assuring effective and efficient implementation of the policy for a certain period of time. The organization of the system includes modifying the system of laws and plans, reorganizing the organizations responsible for agricultural and rural policy, carrying out budget projects, and allocating effective roles among central government, local government, and private-sector bodies, etc. As the result of those efforts, it would be possible to enhance the policy outcomes and establish policy credibility.
목차
[표지]
[머리말]
[요약]
연구배경과 목적
연구방법
연구내용 및 주요결과
[ABSTRACT]
[차례]
표차례
그림차례
[제1장 서론]
1. 연구의 배경과 목적
2. 연구의 주요 내용과 방법
[제2장 정책 연속성의 의의와 농정 추진체계 분석의 틀]
1. 정책 연속성의 의의
2. 정책 추진체계 의의와 분석의 방법
3. 농정의 특징과 분석의 쟁점
4. 농정의 연속성 분석을 위한 틀과 과제
[제3장 전문가 델파이조사로 살펴본 농정의 특징과 과제]
1. 조사개요
2. 1차 델파이조사 결과
3. 2차 델파이조사 결과
4. 결과 종합 및 시사점
[제4장 농정 사례의 연속성 평가]
1. 사례 1: 농업정책
2. 사례 2: 신활력사업
3. 사례 3: 농어촌서비스기준 제도 운영
[제5장 외국의 농정 추진체계와 시사점]
1. 미국의 농업법
2. EU의 공동농업정책(CAP)
3. 미국 · EU 농정 추진의 시사점
[제6장 농정 추진체계 정비의 방향과 과제]
1. 농정 추진체계 정비의 방향
2. Q 방법을 활용한 농정 추진체계 정비 과제 도출
3. 농정 추진체계 정비 과제
[제7장 요약 및 결론]
1. 연구의 요약
2. 결론 및 제언
[부록]
[참고문헌]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
농촌마을정책의 반성과 전환방향
구자인
시선집중 GSnJ
2020
.02
돌아오는 농촌 마을, 현장 실천 주체 만들기 -충남농촌마을정책의 도전과 성과-
구자인
한국농촌경제연구원 연구보고
2019
.05
농촌 지역 활성화 정책의 평가와 발전 방안
김정섭
,
박시현
,
김영단
외 1명
한국농촌경제연구원 기본연구보고서
2011
.11
섬 지역 소상공인의 실태 분석과 정책적 시사점 - 전라남도 완도군 사례를 중심으로 -
신순호
,
박성현
한국지적정보학회지
2024
.08
지역과학기술정책 실행방향 정립에 관한 연구: 경기도 광역자치단체 사업분석을 중심으로
김명진
,
강지민
국토지리학회지
2020
.09
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-520-002558810