메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
도면회 (대전대학교)
저널정보
역사학회 역사학보 歷史學報 第222輯
발행연도
2014.6
수록면
67 - 97 (31page)
DOI
10.16912/khr.2014.06.222.67

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study purports to explore the impact of the international and domestic circumstances of colonial Korea on the Japanese historians’ engagement with Korean history. Since 1915, Government-General in Korea (GGK) began to re-write Korean history according to the “Il-Son Tongjoron”. In the manuscript of Choson Pantosa (the History of Choson Peninsula), the ancient history of Korea was rewritten as a history of Han ethnic groups such as Mahan, Pyonhan, and Jinhan in Southern Korea under the alleged protection of the ancient Japan against Koguryo ethnic group in Northern Korea. However, after March 1st movement in 1919, GGK transformed its policy of unilateral cultural integration into a policy of relative respect for Korean culture. It published Introduction to Korean History in commemoration of the 25th anniversary of the Japanese rule. In this book, Korean history was defined as a history of Choson nation, consisting of both Han and Koguryo ethnic group. Nevertheless, this book was based on the Man-Son view of history, arguing Korean history after the fall of Koguryo as a history of heteronomy under the overwhelming influences of Manchuria and Northern China. In my analysis, This view of history was adopted to justify the Japanese invasion of Manchuria and China, under the slogan of ‘Bloc of Japan-Choson-Manchuria’.

목차

I. 머리말
Ⅱ. 일방적 문화 통합 정책과 ‘한종족사’ 구성
Ⅲ. 조선문화 존중 정책과 ‘조선민족사’ 구성
Ⅳ. 맺음말
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-910-001631470