지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper’s aim is that we can understand the prosess of composing concept of the new-thendendcy novel, by analyzing the monthly survey of the literary world in the middle of the 1920’s. In those days, A monly review was prevelant among the literary magazines, and many authors criticized their colleage-writer’s work. Even though, they were not professional reviewer, a monly review implicated the common-sense about ‘what is modern literaure’, or ‘what is a good novel’. At that time, what they thought a good novel was, to sum up, the organization of reprentiaton and the production og pleasure. Kim Gi jin and Park Young Hee, the early proletarian literature theorist, agreed partly this common-sense.
However, Kim and Park, as the early proletarian literature theorist, had to explain the “special nature” of proletarian literature in the 1920’s. Kim and Park explained the special nature of proletarian literature as follow this. Firstly, they regarded auther’s view of the world as most important, as a subject matter in novel. This opinion was contrasted strikingly with the writer’s view of the time, in the 1920’s. But they saw the form of the novel, esepecially, the matter of description, very differently. About this description matter, the form of the novel, Kim understood, this matter was the he organization of reprentiaton and the production og pleasure. Kim’s view was nearly accord with the dominant view. Meanwhile, Park thought the discription matter, the form of the novel, as the matter of impicaion to the new world.
However, Kim and Park, as the early proletarian literature theorist, had to explain the “special nature” of proletarian literature in the 1920’s. Kim and Park explained the special nature of proletarian literature as follow this. Firstly, they regarded auther’s view of the world as most important, as a subject matter in novel. This opinion was contrasted strikingly with the writer’s view of the time, in the 1920’s. But they saw the form of the novel, esepecially, the matter of description, very differently. About this description matter, the form of the novel, Kim understood, this matter was the he organization of reprentiaton and the production og pleasure. Kim’s view was nearly accord with the dominant view. Meanwhile, Park thought the discription matter, the form of the novel, as the matter of impicaion to the new world.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 근대소설의 개념 : 재현의 체계와 쾌락의 생산
3. ‘신경향적인 것’의 두 가지 의미
4. 맺음말
참고 문헌
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (25)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-800-001676627