지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Over the past half a century, the central issue in Beckett studies has always been the inside rather than the outside of stage. The problem was that there was nothing, virtually nothing happened on stage. “Nothing happens, twice.” Vivian Mercier’s famous statement summarizing his first impression of Waiting for Godot has become the starting point for numerous studies thereafter. Even though his witty summary clearly embraces insight that goes beyond criticism based on impression, it is not an incontrovertible description of the dramatic piece. The second act of Waiting for Godot is not a simple repetition of the first act. Simply because a lot of things do take place on stage. What does not happen is a specific incident. Primarily, the act of Godot making an appearance on stage does not occur. The majority of scholars including Mercier have analyzed the negativity of the piece by concentrating only on the incident on stage. Interpretation of the theatrical space of Beckett has been based on questions such as what this piece suggests, what is happening on stage, or inversely, what this theatrical stage lacks, and what is not happening on stage. What these questions disregard is the fact that the theatrical space of Beckett inherently contains fundamental boundaries, moreover, that the theatrical space is produced and redefined by the boundaries created through the dialectics of the inside and the outside. Rather than being an isolated space, it is a sort of ‘in-between space’ that exists in between a space and another. The space does not exist on its own, it is defined by its relationship with other spaces. The space is generated not only by the protagonists and their actions but also by the boundaries of the space or its relationship with the outside of the boundaries. This suggests that the theatrical space of Beckett is an antithesis of the tradition of nineteenth century drama as well as an extension and reinterpretation of classical drama. The paper reinterprets the negativity of space in some of Beckett’s major dramatic pieces with particular emphasis on Waiting for Godot and Endgame.
목차
I. 서론
II. 공허와 단절
III. 금지와 사이 공간
IV. No Out. No Back. Only In.
V. 결론
인용 문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (17)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - Barthes, Roland / 1992 / On Racine / California UP
2. [단행본] - Beckett, Samuel / 1976 / Watt / John Calder
3. [단행본] - Beckett, Samuel / 1986 / The Complete Dramatic Works / Faber and Faber
4. [단행본] - Cohn, Ruby. / 2005 / A Beckett Canon / Michigan UP
5. [단행본] - Weller, Shane / 2010 / Beckett and Nothing: Trying to Understand Beckett / Manchester UP : 107 ~ 124
2. [단행본] - Beckett, Samuel / 1976 / Watt / John Calder
3. [단행본] - Beckett, Samuel / 1986 / The Complete Dramatic Works / Faber and Faber
4. [단행본] - Cohn, Ruby. / 2005 / A Beckett Canon / Michigan UP
5. [단행본] - Weller, Shane / 2010 / Beckett and Nothing: Trying to Understand Beckett / Manchester UP : 107 ~ 124
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
이미지를 찍는 시인, JEAN COCTEAU : 오르페우스 3부작을 중심으로
황균민
씨네포럼
2003
.11
체호프의 극작술로 The Young Man from Atlanta 읽기 : 사이와 무대 뒤 효과를 중심으로
정윤길
현대영미드라마
2014
.12
장 콕토의 시적 환상성과 영화적 장치
여금미
인문과학연구
2014
.03
‘침묵’과‘사이’의 징후적(symptomatic) 독해 : 유리 부투소프(Ю.Бутусов)의 무대작업을 중심으로
전정옥
노어노문학
2013
.09
장 콕토의 오르페우스 삼부작에서 손의 미장센과 자전적 서명
여금미
프랑스어권 문화예술연구
2011
.08
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-840-001415100