지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Corporate Social Responsibility has been internationally at the center of discussion while ISO 26000 was adopted and promulgated in 2010. It is known that the discussion has generated from the traditional corporate moving from maximizing profits and shareholders’ centering interests to stakeholders’ centering interests. In other words, the modern society requires that many companies do a business with responsibility, fairness, and transparency while there is a conflict between corporate profits and social publicness.
ISO 2600 as an international standard of social responsibility, demands that other organizations as well as companies join voluntarily so that they identify seven core subjects and prepare for the strategies in the medium to longer term. In specific, it is necessary to confirm whether or not the companies fulfill social responsibility on the labor field under the law, regulation, and collective agreements at the level of ISO 26000. By extension, with the conflict between employers and employees resolved through social dialogue, the government should play a mediatory role to narrow and solve the different opinion and conflict between both parties.
ISO 26000 has officially announced that Corporate Social Responsibility is voluntarily fulfilled and practiced. In this regard, whether or not the social responsibility is fulfilled shall not be forced on the domestic companies. In some possibilities, effectiveness is doubtable and abusing regulations is criticizable. As a result, the government’s support and benefit shall simultaneously be performed in order that companies voluntarily join and fulfill social responsibility and the support and benefit shall give the company having the voluntary choice and requirement. That is to say, the administrative and judicial penalty shall be imposed on the case that the companies violate the requirements under the system of the voluntary choice and requirement.
ISO 2600 as an international standard of social responsibility, demands that other organizations as well as companies join voluntarily so that they identify seven core subjects and prepare for the strategies in the medium to longer term. In specific, it is necessary to confirm whether or not the companies fulfill social responsibility on the labor field under the law, regulation, and collective agreements at the level of ISO 26000. By extension, with the conflict between employers and employees resolved through social dialogue, the government should play a mediatory role to narrow and solve the different opinion and conflict between both parties.
ISO 26000 has officially announced that Corporate Social Responsibility is voluntarily fulfilled and practiced. In this regard, whether or not the social responsibility is fulfilled shall not be forced on the domestic companies. In some possibilities, effectiveness is doubtable and abusing regulations is criticizable. As a result, the government’s support and benefit shall simultaneously be performed in order that companies voluntarily join and fulfill social responsibility and the support and benefit shall give the company having the voluntary choice and requirement. That is to say, the administrative and judicial penalty shall be imposed on the case that the companies violate the requirements under the system of the voluntary choice and requirement.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. ISO 26000 (International Organization for Standardization 26000)
Ⅲ. ISO 26000의 국내 적용 가능성
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (25)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 강철웅 / 2008 / ISO 26000에 대한 민주노총의 입장 / 노동리뷰 (41)
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 강충호 / 2008 / ISO 26000에 대한 한국노총의 입장 / 노동리뷰 (41)
3. [기타자료] - 권기석 / 2014 / 현대차 신입 채용방식 논란…인문계 상시 채용ㆍ이공계만 공채 / 국민일보
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 권한용 / 2011 / 기업의 사회적 책임에 대한 국제적 논의와 법적 과제 / 동아법학 (53) : 717 ~ 752
5. [기타자료] - 김정유 / 2013 / 국제표준 ‘ISO26000’ 정착…정부 역할은? / 이투데이
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 강충호 / 2008 / ISO 26000에 대한 한국노총의 입장 / 노동리뷰 (41)
3. [기타자료] - 권기석 / 2014 / 현대차 신입 채용방식 논란…인문계 상시 채용ㆍ이공계만 공채 / 국민일보
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 권한용 / 2011 / 기업의 사회적 책임에 대한 국제적 논의와 법적 과제 / 동아법학 (53) : 717 ~ 752
5. [기타자료] - 김정유 / 2013 / 국제표준 ‘ISO26000’ 정착…정부 역할은? / 이투데이
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0