지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper re-evaluates the feasibility study of Ganghwa tidal power project based on the cost benefit analysis theory and the general guideline of pre-feasibility study by the KDI Public &Private Infrastructure Investment Management Center.
The re-evaluation results show that the environmental cost could be under-estimated, while the generation benefit and the environmental benefit in the feasibility report for Ganghwa tidal power could be over-estimated. Though the results in 4 scenarios have differences, all the benefit cost ratios (B/C) are by far lower than the B/C ratio 1.87 in the feasibility report published by KOMIPO, a Ganghwa tidal power developer. Even the results from 3 scenarios show the B/C ratios less than 1.0, which means it lacks feasibility.
Just as in the feasibility study on Severn tidal power in UK, the Korean government should introduce the guideline for a pre-feasibility study on a tidal power project and lead a rational decision making process, to reduce social conflicts and costs. Furthermore, a better institutional device will be needed to strengthen fairness and objectivity of a feasibility study on tidal power projects.
The re-evaluation results show that the environmental cost could be under-estimated, while the generation benefit and the environmental benefit in the feasibility report for Ganghwa tidal power could be over-estimated. Though the results in 4 scenarios have differences, all the benefit cost ratios (B/C) are by far lower than the B/C ratio 1.87 in the feasibility report published by KOMIPO, a Ganghwa tidal power developer. Even the results from 3 scenarios show the B/C ratios less than 1.0, which means it lacks feasibility.
Just as in the feasibility study on Severn tidal power in UK, the Korean government should introduce the guideline for a pre-feasibility study on a tidal power project and lead a rational decision making process, to reduce social conflicts and costs. Furthermore, a better institutional device will be needed to strengthen fairness and objectivity of a feasibility study on tidal power projects.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 선행연구 검토
Ⅲ. 강화조력발전 사업과 타당성 분석
Ⅳ. 강화조력발전 사업 경제성 분석의 재평가
Ⅴ. 결론 및 정책적 시사점
참고문헌
참고문헌 (1)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-530-001332087