지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Through the Muselmann which is a mark of Auschwitz-Birkenau, meaning ‘a walking corpse’ or ‘Homor Sacer’ considered to be a hollow life, what should we worry about today? At this point where the judgment that the question above is directly connected with ‘what is human being?’, I understand that Edith Stein expressed a best theory on human being in her main work Der Aufbau der menschlichen Person(Hrsg. von L. Gelber und M. Linssen, Herder). The work certainly illuminates the central idea of Edith Stein, who ironically died in Auschwitz-Birkenau.
In this paper, although there are various interpretations of Descartes today, I attempt to lay bare Descartes’ philosophy of subjectivity criticized by Heidegger and Descartes’ theory of life from the perspective of Bergson, and examine Martin Heidegger’s Descartes and Henri Bergson’s Descartes from the perspective of philosopher Edith Stein(1891-1942). On the one hand, I try to chase after what challenge was make to Descartes’s dualistic substantialism and life theory by the 20th century German philosopher Edith Stein. On the other hand, in order to appreciate Descartes’ thoughts in a proper way, I attempt to reveal indirectly what relation those ideas have with the idea of Heidegger who was Stein’s colleague and had interchanged many ideas with her and, at the same time, what connection those ideas have with Bergson’s idea. By means of considering how a contemporary philosopher Edith Stein had struggled to overcome Descartes’ ideas, I conclude that on the one hand, modern philosophy and contemporary philosophy have a point of contact as well as discrepancies, and on the other hand, combining a modern philosopher Rene Descartes with a contemporary philosopher Edith Stein can open a new chapter for the history of philosophy.
In this paper, although there are various interpretations of Descartes today, I attempt to lay bare Descartes’ philosophy of subjectivity criticized by Heidegger and Descartes’ theory of life from the perspective of Bergson, and examine Martin Heidegger’s Descartes and Henri Bergson’s Descartes from the perspective of philosopher Edith Stein(1891-1942). On the one hand, I try to chase after what challenge was make to Descartes’s dualistic substantialism and life theory by the 20th century German philosopher Edith Stein. On the other hand, in order to appreciate Descartes’ thoughts in a proper way, I attempt to reveal indirectly what relation those ideas have with the idea of Heidegger who was Stein’s colleague and had interchanged many ideas with her and, at the same time, what connection those ideas have with Bergson’s idea. By means of considering how a contemporary philosopher Edith Stein had struggled to overcome Descartes’ ideas, I conclude that on the one hand, modern philosophy and contemporary philosophy have a point of contact as well as discrepancies, and on the other hand, combining a modern philosopher Rene Descartes with a contemporary philosopher Edith Stein can open a new chapter for the history of philosophy.
목차
요약문
1. 들어가는 말 : 데카르트와 에디트 슈타인
2. 본론
3. 결론을 대신하며
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
에디트 슈타인과 중세 스콜라철학의 수용 －제1부－ : 왜 에디트 슈타인인가? －후설과 더불어, 후설을 넘어서
이은영
현상학과 현대철학
2011
.03
에디트 슈타인의 현상학 : 슈타인의 ‘눈’으로 본 현상학을 중심으로
이은영
현상학과 현대철학
2007
.02
예술과 사회의 공진화 : 케테 콜비츠의 판화미학
김종길
더원미술세계
2015
.05
데카르트의 『제일철학에 대한 성찰』에서 초월론적 타자이론
이종주
철학사상
2015
.05
시지각의 촉각적 성격에 관한 연구 : 근대 철학에서의 촉각 개념에서 메를로-퐁티의 살 존재론까지
정지은
현상학과 현대철학
2014
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-130-001348045