지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This research will analyze the Senkaku/Diaoyu situation by looking at the relationship between the economic, political, social and cultural aspects of the dispute. The methodology used will be a review of various American, Japanese, Chinese and Korean authors that have written on the dispute. This literature review will allow us a more accurate assessment of the economic, political, social and cultural phenomena that influence the territorial dispute. Finally, this paper will contribute to the literature on the dispute through a discussion on the relationship that exists between the different dimensions, and particularly how each dimension influences the other.
Economically, the expected reward is the oil and gas that is believed to be in the disputed area. However, we also find that as tensions over the islands rise, trade relations between the two countries are negatively affected. The need to preserve the economic benefits of trade stops the conflict from ever escalating beyond a certain point. The political relationship has been following a similar dynamic. Despite the use of acrimonious rhetoric, both countries proved willing to co-operate politically whenever the long term relationship was at risk. This leads us to conclude that the bilateral political relationship is largely at the service of the economic and trade relationship that exists between the countries.
Yet, from this review, it is clear that what has most contributed to keeping the dispute alive are social and cultural factors and the impact they have on the domestic politics of both countries. Reviewing the economic and diplomatic aspects of the dispute, we often noted that patriotic sentiments have a strong impact on the development of events. The islands are a nationalistic symbol for conservatives in both countries, where politicians often use this symbol for their own domestic political advantages.
Economically, the expected reward is the oil and gas that is believed to be in the disputed area. However, we also find that as tensions over the islands rise, trade relations between the two countries are negatively affected. The need to preserve the economic benefits of trade stops the conflict from ever escalating beyond a certain point. The political relationship has been following a similar dynamic. Despite the use of acrimonious rhetoric, both countries proved willing to co-operate politically whenever the long term relationship was at risk. This leads us to conclude that the bilateral political relationship is largely at the service of the economic and trade relationship that exists between the countries.
Yet, from this review, it is clear that what has most contributed to keeping the dispute alive are social and cultural factors and the impact they have on the domestic politics of both countries. Reviewing the economic and diplomatic aspects of the dispute, we often noted that patriotic sentiments have a strong impact on the development of events. The islands are a nationalistic symbol for conservatives in both countries, where politicians often use this symbol for their own domestic political advantages.
목차
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Economic Relations
Ⅲ. Bilateral Political Relations
Ⅳ. International Political Relations
Ⅴ. Nationalism in Japan and China
Ⅵ. Anti-Japanese Sentiment
Ⅶ. Conclusion
References
【논문초록】
참고문헌 (30)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - Alkhalili, Omar / 2013 / Disputed Territory: The Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands / Political Geography Now
2. [기타자료] - BBC Online / 2013 / China Media: Territorial Dispute with Japan / October 30
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Blanchard, J. F. / 2000 / The U.S Role in the Sino-Japanese Dispute over the Diaoyu (Senkaku) Islands 1945–1971 / China Quarterly 161 : 95 ~ 123
4. [기타자료] - Clement, Nicolas / 2012 / Economic Cost of China’s Anti-Japanese Sentiment / Fair Observer
5. [기타자료] - CNN Online / 2012 / Chinese Tourists Cancel Trips to Japan Amid Island Spat
2. [기타자료] - BBC Online / 2013 / China Media: Territorial Dispute with Japan / October 30
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Blanchard, J. F. / 2000 / The U.S Role in the Sino-Japanese Dispute over the Diaoyu (Senkaku) Islands 1945–1971 / China Quarterly 161 : 95 ~ 123
4. [기타자료] - Clement, Nicolas / 2012 / Economic Cost of China’s Anti-Japanese Sentiment / Fair Observer
5. [기타자료] - CNN Online / 2012 / Chinese Tourists Cancel Trips to Japan Amid Island Spat
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-900-001352018