메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
강태웅 (단국대학교) 김태선 (단국대학교)
저널정보
대한건축학회 대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계 大韓建築學會論文集 計劃系 第30卷 第3號
발행연도
2014.3
수록면
175 - 182 (8page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Generally, theories of modernism urban architecture in the first half of 20<SUP>th</SUP> century are known to be developed among debates in CIAM. At the time of formation of CIAM in 1928, one of the important concepts among those times was the standardization. CIAM had focused on the relation between architecture and general economy system and linked economic efficiency into the method of building production, declaring this way to be the universal modern architecture. However, the idea of Berlage who had already performed various collective housing and urban planning projects on the basis of the standardization was distinguishable form what CIAM had pursued on. Berlage’s idea of standardization in terms of urban architecture was just like a tool, which embodies the new city culture and it was a part of his plenty of other urban architectural ideologies. In Berlage’s idea of urban architecture, city structure must be consisted with human behavior-oriented factors such as housing, not implementing strategy of reductionism or simplicity, which CIAM had proposed. The point is, although Berlage signed La Sarraz declare of 1928 nominally, CIAM’s notions did not meet Berlage’s lofty goal, and CIAM’s rather iconoclastic way of proclaiming La Sarraz declare was clearly contradicted to theoretical position that Berlage indicated.

목차

Abstract
1. 서론
2. 베를라헤의 도시건축 이념
3. CIAM의 도시건축 이념
4. 근대 도시·건축의 프리즘
5. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (1)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0