지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study is about an analysis of whether there is any morphological features-as of a verb by classifying the surface by semantic and syntactic aspects.
In an aspect of syntactic, with the general theory of the Cruse (1993) and Kuroda (1973), from a test of interconnection between that was applied as an analytical reference point of morpheme-as a verb that has not been mentioned so far and state change adverb voluntary and, the results of the analysis through that test of the presence or absence of co-occurrence of the “by itself”, the modified test of state adverb, that ambiguity test of recursive noun, I can put meanings that whether morpheme-as of a verb is transitive or abbreviation for causative can be clarified in terms of syntactic feature.
As for the semantic feature, it was found that there can be a case of morphological-as of a verb classified as abbreviation for causative and transitive and as lexical causative.
When it is classified as a transitive verb, there was a characteristic lexical intransitive corresponding in non accusative verbs primarily, in the case of the inanimate noun with no intention of the subject of the intransitive that were many.
Also, if it is used as abbreviation for causative, as a non capacity verbs that acts the corresponding function, there was a characteristic lexical of animate noun that has the will and action of the subject followed.
Finally, if it is used in lexical causative, as a case of the transitive verb with a corresponding intransitive verb that represents a causative meaning while being transitive, although there may be causative form of intransitive corresponding form of -(s) aseru, I found that morpheme -as of this verb is far from a shortened form of the -(s) aseru. In other words, it is distinguished from those shorthand-as causative form -aseru unpaired intransitive that represents a causative meaning.
In an aspect of syntactic, with the general theory of the Cruse (1993) and Kuroda (1973), from a test of interconnection between that was applied as an analytical reference point of morpheme-as a verb that has not been mentioned so far and state change adverb voluntary and, the results of the analysis through that test of the presence or absence of co-occurrence of the “by itself”, the modified test of state adverb, that ambiguity test of recursive noun, I can put meanings that whether morpheme-as of a verb is transitive or abbreviation for causative can be clarified in terms of syntactic feature.
As for the semantic feature, it was found that there can be a case of morphological-as of a verb classified as abbreviation for causative and transitive and as lexical causative.
When it is classified as a transitive verb, there was a characteristic lexical intransitive corresponding in non accusative verbs primarily, in the case of the inanimate noun with no intention of the subject of the intransitive that were many.
Also, if it is used as abbreviation for causative, as a non capacity verbs that acts the corresponding function, there was a characteristic lexical of animate noun that has the will and action of the subject followed.
Finally, if it is used in lexical causative, as a case of the transitive verb with a corresponding intransitive verb that represents a causative meaning while being transitive, although there may be causative form of intransitive corresponding form of -(s) aseru, I found that morpheme -as of this verb is far from a shortened form of the -(s) aseru. In other words, it is distinguished from those shorthand-as causative form -aseru unpaired intransitive that represents a causative meaning.
목차
〈Abstract〉
1. はじめに
2. 先行硏究及び問題提起
3. 他動詞文と使役文
4. -as他動詞と-as使役の區分
5. 結論
參考文獻
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0