지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Claude Levi-Strauss argued that human cognition, which is based on logical thought, is independent of social context. From this, he proposed that the taboo is a comprehensive and coherent classificatory system enabling individuals to classify the world in a rational fashion. In this judgment, he explained that the taboo is a nominal difference which has a logical validity. Its acceptance amounts to validate the differential attribute between the forbidden and the permitted, in epistemology between one cognizable and another cognizable, and to renounce their mixture. When we abide by the nominal rule, its effectiveness will be maintained. The rule dishonored will be naturally related to the loss or weakening of meaning, even if a punishment is imposed.
But, in our perspective, the taboo is the epistemological difference involved in the dynamic activity of thought based on the opposition between the sacred and the impure; in other words, between the non-cognizable and the cognizable, which should be defined only in terms of one another. Here, in dignity and power and as a source of inspiration and identity, the sacred is superior to the impure. It is therefore directly related to the discriminative judgment.
In this condition, it is necessary to understand that violation the taboo is usually not considered to be a loss or weakening of its significance, because an intentional defiance, what we said as a ritual violation, is inherent in the system itself of taboo. The efficiency of taboo is fundamentally based on the existence of the inevitable violation. Actually, if the entire member does not attend in the ritual, the ritual violation will reproduce a discriminative structure between the attendants and the non-attendants.
But, in our perspective, the taboo is the epistemological difference involved in the dynamic activity of thought based on the opposition between the sacred and the impure; in other words, between the non-cognizable and the cognizable, which should be defined only in terms of one another. Here, in dignity and power and as a source of inspiration and identity, the sacred is superior to the impure. It is therefore directly related to the discriminative judgment.
In this condition, it is necessary to understand that violation the taboo is usually not considered to be a loss or weakening of its significance, because an intentional defiance, what we said as a ritual violation, is inherent in the system itself of taboo. The efficiency of taboo is fundamentally based on the existence of the inevitable violation. Actually, if the entire member does not attend in the ritual, the ritual violation will reproduce a discriminative structure between the attendants and the non-attendants.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 종교적인 세계관에서의 타부적 이항대립 : `성/속`의 차별적 이항대립
Ⅲ. 세속적인 세계관에서의 타부적 이항대립 : `순수/불순`의 차별적 이항대립
Ⅳ. 이론적인 관점에서의 타부적 이항대립
Ⅴ. 의례, 혹은 타부적 이항대립의 고의적 해체
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (1)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
2014년 퀴어문화축제의 경험, 성적 혐오의 조직화를 방관해서는 안 되는 이유
나영
뉴 래디컬 리뷰
2014
.09
‘통합정책’에서 ‘편입정책’으로 : 프랑스 ‘능동적 복지국가론’의 정책기조와 국가의 역할
최일성
정치사상연구
2013
.05
한국사회 젠더 갈등과 ‘사회 통합’
이재경
저스티스
2013
.02
루소의 공화국, 혹은 가족과 사회의 부재 : 이폴리트 텐의 루소 비판
최일성
현대정치연구
2012
.10
손해배상금의 과세범위 : 소득세제와 소비세제의 성질에 따른 차용개념의 정당한 해석방법
우지훈
,
양인준
조세법연구
2018
.08
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-200-001211842