지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2012.6
- 수록면
- 31 - 57 (27page)
- DOI
- 10.15235/jir.2012.6.15.1.31
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study is to define the foreign policy choices that a declining hegemony adopts toward challenging state which undermining existing international order. Specifically it attempts to find the foreign polices that next U.S. government adopts toward North Korea which undermines nuclear nonproliferation norm that has supported the U.S. dominating international order. For the purpose, it compares and contrasts the North Korean policies of Obama Candidate of Democratic Party with those of Romney Candidate of Republican Party who run for the 2012 U.S. Presidential election.
The results of the analysis confirm that Obama Candidate may adopt an offshore balancing strategy which emphasizes arms reduction and burden shifting to allies as well as a selective engagement strategy that stresses strengthening alliance with South Korea and Japan and overwhelming military capabilities to contain and prevent North Korea from undermining existing order. On the contrary, Romney Candidate likely pursues a selective engagement strategy that focuses on enhancement of alliance as well as a global hegemony strategy which emphasizes arms buildup.
In that sense, it may anticipate Obama next government may adopt a “Omnidirectional Containment policy with conditional dialogue” since it emphasizes more on the recovery of economy and avoids unnecessary military conflicts with North Korea. On the other hand, Romney next administration may pursue “an absolute high-degree containment policy” which includes preemptive attacks toward North Korea to lead it to self-destruction.
The results of the analysis confirm that Obama Candidate may adopt an offshore balancing strategy which emphasizes arms reduction and burden shifting to allies as well as a selective engagement strategy that stresses strengthening alliance with South Korea and Japan and overwhelming military capabilities to contain and prevent North Korea from undermining existing order. On the contrary, Romney Candidate likely pursues a selective engagement strategy that focuses on enhancement of alliance as well as a global hegemony strategy which emphasizes arms buildup.
In that sense, it may anticipate Obama next government may adopt a “Omnidirectional Containment policy with conditional dialogue” since it emphasizes more on the recovery of economy and avoids unnecessary military conflicts with North Korea. On the other hand, Romney next administration may pursue “an absolute high-degree containment policy” which includes preemptive attacks toward North Korea to lead it to self-destruction.
목차
ABSTRACT
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 미국의 쇠퇴와 대북정책의 현황
Ⅲ. 미국 차기정부 대북정책에 대한 이론적 주장들
Ⅳ. 미국 민주당 버락 오바마후보의 대북한정책 : “전방위 봉쇄속 조건부 대화정책”
Ⅴ. 미국 공화당 미트 롬니후보의 대북한정책 : “자체붕괴 유도의 고도 봉쇄정책”
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (38)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-340-001260253