메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
변창구 (대구가톨릭대학교)
저널정보
동아시아국제정치학회 국제정치연구 국제정치연구 제14집 제2호
발행연도
2011.12
수록면
1 - 20 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the dilemma of non-interference principle in regional cooperation such as human rights issues among ASEAN(Association of Southeast Asian Nations) members. The non-interference in internal affairs is a core principle of so-called “ASEAN way”, which has played a very important role in Southeast Asian integration process.
However the principle has been also misused by authoritarian regimes in Southeast Asia. The Myanmar"s military junta is notorious for blatant breach of democratic principles and basic human rights. Myanmar strongly criticize ASEAN"s call for the release of Aung San Suu Kyi, the leader of NLD(National League for Democracy). In order to increase human rights in member states like Myanmar or Cambodia ASEAN"s involvement is inevitable. But these behaviour is contrary to the principle of non-interference in internal affairs. This is a ASEAN"s dilemma.
To overcome this dilemma, Thailand proposed “constructive engagement” or “flexible engagement” and Philippine supported these ideas. But most of the ASEAN members opposed this proposal because of the possibilities of violating national sovereignty. As a compromise, in 1988 ASEAN adapted the less intrusive principle called “enhanced interaction”. This means that ASEAN members recognize not only modifying but the importance of preserving the principle of non-interference.
Since this compromise, ASEAN members have begun to interpret this principle in a more flexible way, and ASEAN"s flexible engagement in human right issues has been increased. Futhermore in 2009 ASEAN Summit decided to establishing “AICHR(ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights)” and in recent years civil society such as APA(ASEAN Peoples" Assembly) has been greatly developed. And so the possibilities to overcome the dilemma of non-interference principle is increased.

목차

ABSTRACT
Ⅰ. 문제의 제기
Ⅱ. 내정불간섭원칙의 채택 배경과 의의
Ⅲ. 인권탄압과 내정불간섭원칙의 딜레마
Ⅳ. 내정불간섭원칙의 수정과 인권신장의 제도화 모색
Ⅴ. 맺는말
참고문헌

참고문헌 (38)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-340-001258453