지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The sovereignty dispute among China and Japan over Diaoyudao/Senkaku Islands has been rekindled in connection with the geographical, geopolitical and geological circumstance of Northeast Asia. The disputed islands are a group of five small volcanic islands and rocky outcroppings at the East China Sea. The Islands are located about 120 nautical miles northeast of Taiwan, 200 nautical miles east of mainland China and 200 nautical miles southwest of Okinawa. The Chinese claim seems to be based on discovery and effective occupation in terms of territorial acquisition under international law.
The position of Japanese Government on Diaoyudao/Senkaku Islands was expressed by “the Basic View of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Senkaku Islands”. It argues that this incorporation act met with no Chinese protest.
Both countries have different claims on the basis of sovereignty in Diaoyudao/Senkaku Islands dispute, ‘occupation over terra nullius’ and ‘historical title’. Japan has been holding the grounds of ‘occupation’ on the basis of the first discovery of Diaoyudao/Senkaku Islands, the effective control, and the completion of legal prescription. China has presented not only historical evidences such as the first discovery of Diaoyudao/Senkaku Islands, the jurisdiction and the name but also a variety of evidences including nautical charts. Both countries, however, are still arguing since they have not drawn conclusions caused by other evidences and divergent opinions.
The position of Japanese Government on Diaoyudao/Senkaku Islands was expressed by “the Basic View of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Senkaku Islands”. It argues that this incorporation act met with no Chinese protest.
Both countries have different claims on the basis of sovereignty in Diaoyudao/Senkaku Islands dispute, ‘occupation over terra nullius’ and ‘historical title’. Japan has been holding the grounds of ‘occupation’ on the basis of the first discovery of Diaoyudao/Senkaku Islands, the effective control, and the completion of legal prescription. China has presented not only historical evidences such as the first discovery of Diaoyudao/Senkaku Islands, the jurisdiction and the name but also a variety of evidences including nautical charts. Both countries, however, are still arguing since they have not drawn conclusions caused by other evidences and divergent opinions.
목차
ABSTRACT
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 중일 조어도 분쟁의 기원과 법적 준거
Ⅲ. 일본의 무주지 선점론과 주장의 근거
Ⅳ. 중국의 역사주권론과 주장의 근거
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (31)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - 이정태 / 2005 / 신중국의 해권과 해양영토 / 대왕사
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이정태 / 2007 / 중국의 해양영토 귀속판단 / 한국동북아논총 12 (44) : 295 ~ 316
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이정태 / 2005 / 중일 해양영토분쟁과 중국의 대응 / 대한정치학회보 13 (2) : 175 ~ 199
4. [단행본] - 이석우 / 2003 / 일본의 영토분쟁과 샌프란시스코 평화조약 / 인하대학교출판부
5. [단행본] - 요미우리신문 정치부 / 2007 / 검증 국가전략 없는 일본 / 한국해양전략연구소
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이정태 / 2007 / 중국의 해양영토 귀속판단 / 한국동북아논총 12 (44) : 295 ~ 316
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이정태 / 2005 / 중일 해양영토분쟁과 중국의 대응 / 대한정치학회보 13 (2) : 175 ~ 199
4. [단행본] - 이석우 / 2003 / 일본의 영토분쟁과 샌프란시스코 평화조약 / 인하대학교출판부
5. [단행본] - 요미우리신문 정치부 / 2007 / 검증 국가전략 없는 일본 / 한국해양전략연구소
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-340-001271612