지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2012.11
- 수록면
- 1 - 144 (144page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
To relieve traffic congestion during peak periods without having to invest in new transportation facilities, the pricing adjustment in transport sector shows excellent efficiency. However, the feasibility of such policy is low because the pricing is closely related to citizen’s life and is often met with strong objection.
This study first focuses on the understanding the interests of different stakeholders of the pricing policy and sets the direction how this delegate matter should be addressed. Then, policies that would enhance the social consensus on accepting the pricing policy with different time zones are discussed.
The current pricing policy in Seoul’s transport sector is the flat rate charge. Although the traffic demand varies by the time of day, all the transportation fees; parking fees, public transportation fees and congestion tolls are all charged with the same amount.
Charging rate in the transport sectors of other foreign cities show a diverse range that distinguishes peak and off-peak period. In particular public transportation fares were higher during the peak period. Parking fees were raised by 200% of standard fees during the peak period to reduce social costs. Also, the congestion toll was higher during the morning and afternoon peak period where the demands are concentrated.
A survey conducted within this study showed that general public would be affected by the pricing adjustments with additional policies such as enabling flexible working hours. With such adequate policies general public would adopt pricing adjustments in parking fees or congestion tolls.
The public transportation fare refund program affects significantly on both public transportation users and private car users, it also improves the preference of the public transportation. Various administrative supports such as tax exemptions should be made for the companies that introduce such program.
Companies are recommended no longer assist parking fees or parking spaces to demote the use of private cars and attempt to ensure the flexible working hours for their employees. In addition, companies should activate the public transportation fare refund program to promote the use of public transportation.
This study first focuses on the understanding the interests of different stakeholders of the pricing policy and sets the direction how this delegate matter should be addressed. Then, policies that would enhance the social consensus on accepting the pricing policy with different time zones are discussed.
The current pricing policy in Seoul’s transport sector is the flat rate charge. Although the traffic demand varies by the time of day, all the transportation fees; parking fees, public transportation fees and congestion tolls are all charged with the same amount.
Charging rate in the transport sectors of other foreign cities show a diverse range that distinguishes peak and off-peak period. In particular public transportation fares were higher during the peak period. Parking fees were raised by 200% of standard fees during the peak period to reduce social costs. Also, the congestion toll was higher during the morning and afternoon peak period where the demands are concentrated.
A survey conducted within this study showed that general public would be affected by the pricing adjustments with additional policies such as enabling flexible working hours. With such adequate policies general public would adopt pricing adjustments in parking fees or congestion tolls.
The public transportation fare refund program affects significantly on both public transportation users and private car users, it also improves the preference of the public transportation. Various administrative supports such as tax exemptions should be made for the companies that introduce such program.
Companies are recommended no longer assist parking fees or parking spaces to demote the use of private cars and attempt to ensure the flexible working hours for their employees. In addition, companies should activate the public transportation fare refund program to promote the use of public transportation.
목차
[표지]
[표제지]
[요약 및 정책건의]
[목차]
표목차
그림목차
[제1장 연구의 개요]
제1절 연구의 배경 및 목적
제2절 연구의 내용 및 체계
[제2장 국내 교통부문 요금제도의 개요]
제1절 대중교통요금
제2절 주차요금
제3절 혼잡통행료
제4절 국내 교통부문 요금제도 문제점
[제3장 변동요금제의 의의 및 해외사례]
제1절 의의 및 이론적 근거
제2절 해외사례
[제4장 교통부문 변동요금제 도입방안 분석]
제1절 분석개요
제2절 분석내용
제3절 분석방법론
[제5장 교통부문 변동요금제 도입방안]
제1절 대중교통부문
제2절 주차부문
제3절 혼잡통행료부문
제4절 소결
[제6장 교통부문 변동요금제 도입효과]
제1절 시간대 이전효과
제2절 수단 전환 효과
[제7장 결론 및 정책건의]
제1절 결론
제2절 정책 건의
[참고문헌]
[부록]
[영문요약(Abstract)]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-350-001114236