메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김서영 (광운대학교)
저널정보
한국영화학회 영화연구 영화연구 58호
발행연도
2013.12
수록면
55 - 85 (31page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper examines the implication of Jacques Lacan’s Seminar XXIII depicted in Ingmar Bergman’s film, Persona. The latter has been analysed in various ways: one considers it as one of the art films and the other, as a protest against the typical custom of hollywood. These perspectives, however, do not reveal the unique way of the film originating from the director’s life. The film cannot be analysed without looking at the directors own life and his belief in human holiness. It has to be understood as an evidence that proves the unique way of Bergman’s organizing his life. The world created by Bergman’s sinthome is not completely subjected to the Lacanian symbolic order since it does not follow the name/law of the father. The nomination process is carried out not centering around the latter but around the directors own commend.
This is exactly what Lacan has examined in Joyce’s writings, or his sinthome. He asserts that Joyce has created a unique world in which the law of the father is substituted by his own way of nomination. It is a world where the writer can live according to his own rules and plans. The sinthome is the very concept that has been offered in order to refer to this singularity which has the structure of ‘mais pas ca’(but not that). The sinthome is the forth knot that connects the remaining orders of the Symbolic, the Imaginary, and the Real in the Borromean knot. This concept has been introduced in the 23rd seminar of Lacan in connection with his analysis of James Joyce.
This paper has demonstrated that one can observe the similar sinthome/writing in Bergman’s life and in his work, and has shown how Bergman’s sinthome has created the basic structure of Persona. There is the element of human holiness at the center of the film and yet it is combined with the most humanly limits, both leading the audiences to witness the birth of the subject. The ultimate aim of this paper has been to represent the possibility of the birth of the subject who can create his/her individual space where the singularity of each person is most cherished and the dream of each subject comes true. This is also the ultimate place where the subject has to be at the end of the analysis in psychoanalytic practice.

목차

1. 들어가는 말: 인간의 신성 그리고 실재
2. 텍스트 분석: 거짓된 삶 대 진실한 삶
3. 라캉의 『세미나 XXIII: 생톰』 을 통한 새로운 정신분석적 비평의 모색
4. 포스터의〈페르조나〉분석: 연대의 가능성을 꿈꾸며
5. 베리만의 생톰: 무대와 프레임에 새겨진 자아의 글쓰기
6. 나가는 말: 새로운 의미의 창조를 위하여
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (18)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-688-000997978