지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The article 6 of the Korean Labor Standard Act says no employer shall discriminate against workers on the basis of gender, or give discriminatory treatment in relation to the conditions of labor on the basis of nationality, religion or social status.
This papers explores on the origin of nationality discrimination in the article 6 to examines foreign workers’ right at work in respect of discrimination.
There are many sections in Korean LSA similar to the Japanese LSA. Nationality discrimination also originates in Japanese LSA. Thus the study explores the cause of the article 3 in Japanese LSA concentrating on the political and social environment of Japan when it was enacted.
The paper found that the introduction of nationality discrimination was very closely related to the self-reflection on discrimination against Korean and Chinese employees during the Japanese colonial era. Korean lawmakers at that time accepted the principle and the cause without a shadow of doubt and sought to prohibit even race discrimination.
In conclusion the study suggests the improvement of the Act on the Employment, etc. of Foreign Worker in order to supply them with protections in relations to employment.
This papers explores on the origin of nationality discrimination in the article 6 to examines foreign workers’ right at work in respect of discrimination.
There are many sections in Korean LSA similar to the Japanese LSA. Nationality discrimination also originates in Japanese LSA. Thus the study explores the cause of the article 3 in Japanese LSA concentrating on the political and social environment of Japan when it was enacted.
The paper found that the introduction of nationality discrimination was very closely related to the self-reflection on discrimination against Korean and Chinese employees during the Japanese colonial era. Korean lawmakers at that time accepted the principle and the cause without a shadow of doubt and sought to prohibit even race discrimination.
In conclusion the study suggests the improvement of the Act on the Employment, etc. of Foreign Worker in order to supply them with protections in relations to employment.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 연합국 점령 당시 일본의 정치적 환경과 노동3법의 입법개요
Ⅲ. 일본 노동기준법상 국적차별금지조항의 제정배경
Ⅳ. 새로운 문제제기 : 왜 인종이 아니고 국적인가?
Ⅴ. 결론
참고 문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (30)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
업무상 재해를 당한 근로자가 고정된 증상의 악화를 방지하기 위해 받은 치료의 법적 성격과 치료비 책임의 귀속 : 대법원 2013. 12. 12. 선고 2013다210299 판결
노호창
노동법학
2014
.03
국민건강보험공단이 산재보험법상 요양급여가 인정되어야 하는 근로자의 치료비를 대신 납부한 경우 사용자를 상대로 구상할 수 있는지 여부 : 대법원 2013. 8. 22. 선고 2013다25118 판결
노호창
노동법학
2014
.03
직접고용 간주된 근로자에 대한 해고 : 서울중앙지방법원 2013. 10. 31. 선고 2011가합130349 판결
김기선
노동법학
2014
.03
동일가치노동 동일임금 조항 위반의 사법적 효력 : 대법원 2013. 3. 14. 선고 2010다101011 판결
구미영
노동법학
2014
.03
대리운전 기사의 근로자성 : 부산지방법원 2013. 10. 24. 선고 2013구합1929 판결
구미영
노동법학
2014
.03
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-330-001008133