지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper examines predicate phrase (PredP) ellipsis in English, identifying the exact constituent(s) affected by the ellipsis in the articulated structure of a clause projected by modal, perfect, progressive, and voice/copula auxiliary verbs in addition to the little v (Chomsky 1995). In particular, we note that the phrases projected by all these auxiliary verbs, except for modals that project the highest category TP, can undergo PredP ellipsis. However, there are two factors that come into play in influencing sizes of PredP ellipsis. One is dialectal variation, which distinguishes British English from American English in that only the former allows elision of PerfP via PredP ellipsis. The other is structural difference, which tells apart coordination from subordination in that PredP ellipsis applies to vP or the constituent bigger than that in the former structure, but it can apply to the smaller constituent VoiceP in the latter structure. We provide an explanation for how each of the two factors can be understood in the general theory of ellipsis.
목차
1. Introduction
2. Clausal Structure of English
3. Optional Deletion of ‘be’
4. American vs. British English in Regard to Elision of Perfect ‘have’
5. Licensing Condition for PredP Ellipsis
6. The Locus of vP from the Discussion of PredP Ellipsis
7. Is it Always Optional to Delete One of the Predicate Constituents?
8. Conclusion
References
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
『자본』의 철학과 자본의 지배 : 물신 개념 및 일상에 관한 고찰을 중심으로
이병태
통일인문학
2013
.11
The Double Damnation of Othello, a Christian Moor
Hyosik Hwang
Shakespeare Review
2013
.12
김수영의 시론과 ‘리얼리티’
이미순
국어국문학
2013
.12
『어린이』지 수록 동시 연구(1) : 장르 용어 및 작가와 독자를 중심으로
진선희
국어국문학
2013
.12
Referential Terms in English News Headlines in the U.S. and Korea
Hye-Kyung Lee
담화와인지
2013
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-700-001068646