지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (5)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The aims of this paper are two-folded. The first one is to propose that ‘ida’ of ‘gyeongjejeok(=economic)-ida’ and ‘hada’ of ‘yumyeong(=famous)-hada’ be analysed as copulas in Korean grammar. The second one is to examine the possibility of analyzing ‘-(eu)ro<SUB>2</SUB>’ as a derivational suffix deriving adverb from adjectivals such as ‘sijeok(=poetic)’, ‘gyeongjejeok(=economic)’, etc. This derivational suffix ‘-(eu)ro<SUB>2</SUB>’ is distinguished from the case particle '‘-(eu)ro<SUB>1</SUB>’ in ‘doggi-ro(=with an axe)’. The suffix ‘-hi/-i’ is the same case, which derives adverbs from adjectivals such as ‘joyong(=quiet)’, ‘ggaeggeut(=clean)’, etc. These two above-mentioned discussions are based on Mok(2003) and Mok(2009c), which analyzed ‘hada’ and ‘ida’ as support verbs on the syntactico-semantic level. It was shown there that the lexemes X's in the construction ‘X-hada’ and the lexemes Y's in the construction ‘Y-ida’ behave the same syntactico-semantically.
For this, I compared ‘yumyeong-hada(=be famous)’ with ‘gyeongjejeok-ida(=be economic)’. Both ‘yumyeong(=famous)’ and ‘gyeongjejeok(=economic)’ do not function as an argument of predicates, and have the same adjectival properties, so that ‘ida’ and ‘hada’ are in complementary distribution. I define this kind of lexemes as ‘nouny adjectives’, including ‘adnominals’ in contrast with verby adjectives such as ‘keuda(=be big)’, ‘nopta=(-be high)’, etc.
For this, I compared ‘yumyeong-hada(=be famous)’ with ‘gyeongjejeok-ida(=be economic)’. Both ‘yumyeong(=famous)’ and ‘gyeongjejeok(=economic)’ do not function as an argument of predicates, and have the same adjectival properties, so that ‘ida’ and ‘hada’ are in complementary distribution. I define this kind of lexemes as ‘nouny adjectives’, including ‘adnominals’ in contrast with verby adjectives such as ‘keuda(=be big)’, ‘nopta=(-be high)’, etc.
목차
1. 서언
2. 형용사란 범주의 원형
3. 명사성 형용사의 설정 근거
4. 결론을 대신하여
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (6)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-700-002732558