지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The essay introduces Liang Qichao’s Eumbingsiljayuseo, especially its translation in 1908, which exercised huge influence on Korea in the modern period of enlightenment, and examines the social and cultural causes underlying its translational style of writing Korean with Chinese characters in it. His book, in a persuasive way, dealt with basic concepts and themes about modern civilization, including civilization(文明), barbarity(野蠻), freedom(自由), democracy(民主), civil rights(民權), sovereignty(國權), nation(民族), people(國民), national spirit(國魂), army(軍隊), law(法), press(言論). Accordingly, a number of contemporary Korean intellectuals gave it much attention, trying to employ it positively for the patriotic enlightenment movement. The mixed style of Korean and Chinese writing played an important role in the process.
It seems contradictory at first glance that the mixed style of Korean and Chinese writing was prevalent in the establishing process of modern nation-state where much emphasis was given to the use of the national language and the unity of speech and writing. However, it is considered very understandable that the popularity came in a very natural way from Koreans’ strategy to build a modern nation-state by freeing themselves from the yoke of Chinese characters yet taking over in an appropriate way its cultural asset at the same time. To illustrate the causes and background of this process in the social context, the essay cites themes like the users of the mixed style, the effect of translation, the tradition of borrowed writing, the re-adjustment of Chinese character and writing’s position, the confusion in Korean writing and so on.
It seems contradictory at first glance that the mixed style of Korean and Chinese writing was prevalent in the establishing process of modern nation-state where much emphasis was given to the use of the national language and the unity of speech and writing. However, it is considered very understandable that the popularity came in a very natural way from Koreans’ strategy to build a modern nation-state by freeing themselves from the yoke of Chinese characters yet taking over in an appropriate way its cultural asset at the same time. To illustrate the causes and background of this process in the social context, the essay cites themes like the users of the mixed style, the effect of translation, the tradition of borrowed writing, the re-adjustment of Chinese character and writing’s position, the confusion in Korean writing and so on.
목차
1. 서론
2. 『飮氷室自由書』소개
3. 근대계몽기 언문일치와 국한문체
4. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (40)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 강중기 / 2011 / 량치차오, 『음빙실자유서』 / 개념과 소통 (8) : 217 ~ 238
2. [학위논문] - 김병문 / 2012 / 주시경의 근대적 언어 인식에 관한 연구 / 박사 / 연세대학교 대학원
3. [단행본] - 김윤식 / 1999 / 한국문학사(개정판) / 민음사
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김인선 / 1991 / 갑오경장 전후 개화파의 한글 사용-독립신문에서의 한글전용 배경 / 주시경학보 8 : 3 ~ 32
5. [단행본] - 김하수 / 2005 / 언어 제국주의란 무엇인가 / 돌베개
2. [학위논문] - 김병문 / 2012 / 주시경의 근대적 언어 인식에 관한 연구 / 박사 / 연세대학교 대학원
3. [단행본] - 김윤식 / 1999 / 한국문학사(개정판) / 민음사
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 김인선 / 1991 / 갑오경장 전후 개화파의 한글 사용-독립신문에서의 한글전용 배경 / 주시경학보 8 : 3 ~ 32
5. [단행본] - 김하수 / 2005 / 언어 제국주의란 무엇인가 / 돌베개
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0