지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2012.11
- 수록면
- 191 - 213 (25page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
As we commemorate the 20th anniversary of Sino-Korea diplomatic ties, I focus on the things that have changed and things that have not in the history of Sino-Korean relations in order to forecast its future.
In retrospect, the things that have not changed in the history of Sino-Korean relations include the asymmetry, the proximity, and the importance of the position/roles of Korea in the relationship. Things that have changed include the fact that the principle agents forming the Sino-Korean relationship have become more diversified and the appearance of a great power as the third party in Sino-Korean relations.
In order to investigate how these two dimensions interact with each other in an historical context, I examined the memory of the tributary system that to a certain degree still influences the mutual perception of Koreans and Chinese as an example to show how “things that have not changed” continue to work among “things that have changed.”
The tributary system is not a concept that corresponds to the historical reality. Moreover, the system collapsed in reality after the Sino??Japanese War (1894~1895), the image of it has become much more ideologically simplified and has stayed on in people’s memory.
And in this 21st century when China has emerged anew to become a great power, the tributary order is beginning to be recognized as an alternative international order. For that to be realized, China needs to be able to present the universality of civilization as it did in the past. Therefore, the discourse of ‘ultural great power’ and the related ‘iscourse of new Worldism(Tianxia-zhuyi)’ now advocated in China are examined in this study in terms of whether their universality can be proven, with focus on the role of Korea as a peripheral main agent outside of China.
In retrospect, the things that have not changed in the history of Sino-Korean relations include the asymmetry, the proximity, and the importance of the position/roles of Korea in the relationship. Things that have changed include the fact that the principle agents forming the Sino-Korean relationship have become more diversified and the appearance of a great power as the third party in Sino-Korean relations.
In order to investigate how these two dimensions interact with each other in an historical context, I examined the memory of the tributary system that to a certain degree still influences the mutual perception of Koreans and Chinese as an example to show how “things that have not changed” continue to work among “things that have changed.”
The tributary system is not a concept that corresponds to the historical reality. Moreover, the system collapsed in reality after the Sino??Japanese War (1894~1895), the image of it has become much more ideologically simplified and has stayed on in people’s memory.
And in this 21st century when China has emerged anew to become a great power, the tributary order is beginning to be recognized as an alternative international order. For that to be realized, China needs to be able to present the universality of civilization as it did in the past. Therefore, the discourse of ‘ultural great power’ and the related ‘iscourse of new Worldism(Tianxia-zhuyi)’ now advocated in China are examined in this study in terms of whether their universality can be proven, with focus on the role of Korea as a peripheral main agent outside of China.
목차
1. 중국은 우리의 운명인가?
2. 한중관계를 규정하는 역사적 조건
3. 조공 질서는 부활하는가?
4. 문화대국론과 신천하주의
5. 주변의 시각, 서로를 비추는 거울
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-905-000678361