메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김연희 (대구가톨릭대학교)
저널정보
한국영어학회 영어학 영어학 Volume.13 Number.3
발행연도
2013.9
수록면
465 - 496 (32page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
With the increasing interest in performance assessment, many studies have explored the potential variability inherent in rating scales. In particular, the types of rating scales have drawn much interest from researchers in second language assessment and testing. Accordingly, the present study examined the extent to which different types of rating scales (i.e., holistic and analytic) affected rater reliability, rater severity, scale calibration, and rater perceptions. Twelve raters assessed 30 essays using both holistic and analytic rating scales and their ratings were analyzed using the many-faceted Rasch model. The raters also completed a questionnaire on their perceptions of using holistic and analytic scales. Raters demonstrated higher internal consistency when using the analytic rating scale, but slightly higher inter-rater reliability when using the holistic rating scale. In addition, the raters not only perceived the middle categories of the rating scale more broadly when using the holistic rating scale, but were also more lenient in their assessment. It was also found that the raters perceived analytic rating scales as being more appropriate for school-based classroom assessment. Based on these findings, the pedagogical implications of using rating scales in classroom assessment are discussed.

목차

1. 서론
2. 문헌 연구
3. 연구 방법
4. 연구 결과 및 해석
5. 결론 및 제언
참고문헌

참고문헌 (27)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0