지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2013.8
- 수록면
- 25 - 41 (17page)
- DOI
- 10.15187/adr.2013.08.26.3.25
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Background : Although previous research has contributed to the development of the concept of design innovation, a lack of understanding related to how people actually perceive design innovation still exists. This study aims to investigate perceptions of innovation, and how these perceptions may differ as a result of such factors as background and education.
Methods : Eleven products were selected from among the winners of the 2012 Reddot design awards as examples of innovative product design. Twenty design students and twenty students from a non-design background assessed the innovativeness and desirability of each product using a 5-point Likert scale. Based on Rampino’s innovation framework (2011), innovativeness of Form, Technology, and Mode of Use were assessed together with holistic innovativeness.
Results : The design and non-design students showed significant differences in their perceptions of holistic innovativeness, F (1,38) = 4.372, p < .05. They also perceived Mode of Use differently, indicated by an interaction effect between their major and the types of product they assessed. The results of a correlation analysis between innovativeness and desirability showed that holistic innovativeness is positively related to desirability. In contrast, innovativeness of Technology has a relatively weak relationship to product desire.
Conclusion : A greater understanding of how design innovation is perceived provides useful insights which may then be utilized in the design and development of more desirable, innovative products. In this regard, the investigation provides a foundation for successive studies to link the conceptual principle of design innovation to real-world innovation as it is perceived and experienced by the user.
Methods : Eleven products were selected from among the winners of the 2012 Reddot design awards as examples of innovative product design. Twenty design students and twenty students from a non-design background assessed the innovativeness and desirability of each product using a 5-point Likert scale. Based on Rampino’s innovation framework (2011), innovativeness of Form, Technology, and Mode of Use were assessed together with holistic innovativeness.
Results : The design and non-design students showed significant differences in their perceptions of holistic innovativeness, F (1,38) = 4.372, p < .05. They also perceived Mode of Use differently, indicated by an interaction effect between their major and the types of product they assessed. The results of a correlation analysis between innovativeness and desirability showed that holistic innovativeness is positively related to desirability. In contrast, innovativeness of Technology has a relatively weak relationship to product desire.
Conclusion : A greater understanding of how design innovation is perceived provides useful insights which may then be utilized in the design and development of more desirable, innovative products. In this regard, the investigation provides a foundation for successive studies to link the conceptual principle of design innovation to real-world innovation as it is perceived and experienced by the user.
목차
1. Introduction
2. Methods
3. Results and Discussion
4. Conclusion
References
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
Animation Students’ Engagement and Motivation through Peer Teaching: Online Flipped Classroom Approach
Jae-Eun Oh
,
Yuet Kai Chan
,
Anthony Kong
외 2명
Archives of Design Research
2022
.02
학습자 히스토리를 활용한 녹화 영상 기반 수업 지원 시스템 디자인에 대한 연구
이문환
,
이혁민
,
정성택
Archives of Design Research
2021
.11
디자인씽킹 워크숍에서 서비스디자이너의 퍼실리테이션 역할 및 공동디자인 툴킷 활용에 관한 연구 - 공공분야를 중심으로
안현서
,
구유리
Archives of Design Research
2020
.08
미디어에 나타난 언어 표현 연구 : TV광고의 높임 표현을 중심으로
한호
,
목진요
Archives of Design Research
2017
.02
절전 행동 증진을 위한 공익광고 디자인 전략 연구
신민아
,
윤재영
Archives of Design Research
2017
.02
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-650-002466207