지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
International peacekeeping operations consist of UN-led PKO(UNPKOs) and non-UN-led ones. UNPKOs are directly deployed and financed by the United Nations with the approval of the Security Council, while non-UN PKOs, also known as multinational peacekeeping force(MNF), are international military groups constituting forces from different countries. The latter also requires the Security Council’s consent, but their activities are financially and administratively sponsored by participating countries, usually with a lead nation. As MNF operations are often claimed to be more effective and successful than UN-led PKOs, western (and powerful) countries, which have operational and financial resources with strong combat capabilities, tend to prefer it over UNPKOs.
In the case of Korea, however, there has been a gap, what I call “PKO divide,” where the public, policy makers and national assemblymen have had little objection to dispatching UNPKO forces whereas showing strong reservation or resistance when sending MNF, especially when the U.S. has made a request. As a consequence, the law on UNPKO participation was passed at the National Assembly in 2009, but this law is not applicable to the cases of MNF dispatchment.
Against this backdrop, this paper examines the changing development of international peacekeeping activities and evaluates the role of Korean PKOs, both UN-led and non-UN-led. Then the paper discusses why the PKO divide occurs in Korea and seeks institutional and legal solutions to reduce the gap.
In the case of Korea, however, there has been a gap, what I call “PKO divide,” where the public, policy makers and national assemblymen have had little objection to dispatching UNPKO forces whereas showing strong reservation or resistance when sending MNF, especially when the U.S. has made a request. As a consequence, the law on UNPKO participation was passed at the National Assembly in 2009, but this law is not applicable to the cases of MNF dispatchment.
Against this backdrop, this paper examines the changing development of international peacekeeping activities and evaluates the role of Korean PKOs, both UN-led and non-UN-led. Then the paper discusses why the PKO divide occurs in Korea and seeks institutional and legal solutions to reduce the gap.
목차
I. 서론
II. 국제평화활동의 발전과정
III. 한국의 국제평화활동의 현황 및 평가
IV. 한국의 국제평화활동의 양분화 현상과 개선방안
V. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-900-003230922