지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술대회자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2013.5
- 수록면
- 89 - 94 (6page)
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This research aimed at clarifying the bondage of being of Kukubu Naoichi who was a typical researcher of the ethnogenetic theory of the Japanese people after World War II. As part of an assimilation policy, ethnogenetic theories of the Japanese people were conceived on the assumption of “migration” in order to specify the blood relationship between Asian race and the Japanese race in the period of imperialism age. On the other hand, it was considered that these theories were dangerous ideology and ethnogenetic theories of the Japanese people have been formed only by the view of "cultural diffusion" after World War II. Kokubu who went back from Taiwan in 1949 formed the theory focusing on the culture from southeast asia. The early theory of Kokubu was formed only from the viewpoint of “cultural diffusion”, while the viewpoint of “migration” was eliminated, but the theory after the 90s accepted the theory of the physical authropology which approve ancient Japanese"s half-breed, and was formed from the viewpoint of “migration.” Nevertheless, Kokubu was negative for accepting an academic relation with Torii Ryuzo who hade form the ethnogenetic theory of the Japanese people from the viewpoint of of “migration” before World War II. Although Kokubu emphasized the race from southeast asia, in fact, Torii named it the “Indochinese” in 1916. It is regrettable that postwar researcher have not able to accept the fact plainly under the aftereffect of imperialism
목차
1. はじめに
2．「民族移動」と「文化?播」
3. 「文化?播」による日本民族文化?究
4．形質人類?の?一民族論
5. 鳥居龍?に?する忌避
5. おわりに
〈參考文獻〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-900-003277372