지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper analyzes maps for ancient Korean history in some popular history books. In particular, it addresses how the maps represent their historical contexts by using elements such as points, lines, and polygons. First, some maps represent historical facts that are unrelated to the historical period that their texts describe. Many maps about ancient Korean history mark the northern borderline of contemporary Korea. In those maps, Mountain Baekdu-san is depicted as a marker of the borderline along with the Amnok-kang (Yalu) River and the Tuman-gang (Tumen) River. Second, in showing the territories of and relationships among ancient states, the maps assume the preexisting ‘inside’ and ‘outside’ of the national history of Korea. They depict wars between the three states in the Korean Peninsular as ‘family feuds’ and exchanges among ancient states occur only outside the Peninsular. Third, some maps leave out things that are supposed to be there. For example, many maps do not mark the Malgal (or Mohe; 靺鞨) and the Wae (or Wa; 倭) even though some Malgals prospered with the development of the Koguryo(高句麗) State. This essay finds that the ‘desire’ to embody the history of a nation determines what to depict and what not to depict in the maps in the ancient Korean history books for children and young adults.
목차
Ⅰ. 지도의 내용 분류하기
Ⅱ. ‘그려지는 것들’ : 국경과 백두산
Ⅲ. ‘그리는 것들’ : 영역, 지배, 교류 …
Ⅳ. ‘그리지 않는 것들’ 그리고 ‘그려지지 않은 것들’
Ⅴ. 점, 선, 면 : 무엇을 어떻게 그릴 것인가?
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (2)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-910-003311562