메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
신두호 (강원대학교)
저널정보
문학과환경학회 문학과환경 문학과환경 제12권 1호
발행연도
2013.6
수록면
83 - 103 (21page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Apocalyptic narrative has become a very popular rhetorical means in well-known environment-related writings ranging from science-oriented books like Carson’s Silent Spring to the most recent books by environmental thinkers, politicians, and writers such as Al Gore’s The Inconvenient Truth and Bill McKibben’s Eaarth. Consequently, it has attracted ecocritical attention, but ecocritics as well as environmental thinkers disagree over whether apocalyptic narrative and vision are effective in raising ecological concerns and awareness among general readers. This question of environmental rhetorical communication carries important implication in ecocritical studies because, from the point of departure, ecocriticism has vowed to take literary study’s social responsibility in the age of environmental crisis by means of raising ecological awareness. However, arguments made by both proponents and opponents stop short of elaborating on why; their arguments are no less than superficial and declaratory judgement. This study examines and analyzes the American general public’s psychological and emotional responses to environmental crisis and concludes that apocalyptic rhetoric, contrary to our general belief, is likely to prevent the public from coming into a state of environmental awareness and engaging in environmental activities.

목차

〈인용문헌〉
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (21)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-800-003337856